[linux-yocto] [PATCHv2 4/4] valleyisland-io: update valleyisland-io.scc file

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 12/13/2013, 8:55 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 13-12-11 11:18 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On 12/11/2013, 11:13 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 01:06 +0000, Chang, Rebecca Swee Fun wrote:
>>>> Hi Darren,
>>>>
>>>> 0007-spi-pxa2xx-add-support-for-Intel-Baytrail-SPI-contro.patch was
>>>> removed as I segregated
>>>> the backport commit out from the patch.
>>>>
>>>> This is a v2 pull request and
>>>> 0007-spi-pxa2xx-add-support-for-Baytrail-SPI-controller.patch is a
>>>> new generated patch without the CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL commits.
>>>
>>> $ cd linux-yocto-3.8/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/valleyisland-io
>>> $ grep Baytrail-SPI valleyisland-io.scc
>>> patch 0007-spi-pxa2xx-add-support-for-Intel-Baytrail-SPI-contro.patch
>>> $ ls *Baytrail-SPI*
>>> ls: cannot access *Baytrail-SPI*: No such file or directory
>>>
>>> I see. You removed a patch in a previous push without removing it from
>>> the scc file? So currently the scc file is unbuildable?
>>>
>>> $ cd linux-yocto-3.8/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/features/valleyisland-io
>>> $ ls *patch | wc -l
>>> 12
>>> $ grep patch valleyisland-io.scc  | wc -l
>>> 19
>>
>> Good catch. I've been doing partial pulls, and with the interleaving
>> requests ..
>> this was bound to happen.
>>
>> I mentioned earlier today that I was leaving the build testing (for now)
>> on the submission end of this, I'll do a complete build when everything
>> is merged. There's a reason why i haven't bumped the meta SRCREV yet :)
>>
>>>
>>> You appear to have 6 additional patches listed that do not exist.
>>> Please test your build before submitting patches.
>>>
>>> Please resubmit with the other non-existent patches removed from the scc
>>> as well.
>>
>> That would be ideal.
>>
>> What about the other three pending series ? Honestly, it is fine to batch
>> them all into a single series, since keeping 4 or 5 very similar looking
>> series, with v2/v3 versions straight .. can be challenging :)
>>
>> So to be clear. I'm filing this particular series. Let me know if the
>> other
>> three are good (I haven't seen Darren's Ack), or if we'll do one big
>> consolidated pull request.
>
> ping.

(re) ping ?

Bruce

>
> Any comment on the other pending series, or this one ? I still have
> the other three unapplied waiting to hear if a single large
> consolidated request will be sent that encompasses all outstanding
> merge requests.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-yocto mailing list
>> linux-yocto at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/linux-yocto
>