[linux-yocto] [PATCH 16/28] sched/numa: Fix task_numa_free() lockdep splat

[Yang Shi]

From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket at online.de>

commit 60e69eed85bb7b5198ef70643b5895c26ad76ef7 upstream

Sasha reported that lockdep claims that the following commit:
made numa_group.lock interrupt unsafe:

  156654f491dd ("sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to __put_task_struct()")

While I don't see how that could be, given the commit in question moved
task_numa_free() from one irq enabled region to another, the below does
make both gripes and lockups upon gripe with numa=fake=4 go away.

Reported-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin at oracle.com>
Fixes: 156654f491dd ("sched/numa: Move task_numa_free() to __put_task_struct()")
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket at online.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org>
Cc: torvalds at linux-foundation.org
Cc: mgorman at suse.com
Cc: akpm at linux-foundation.org
Cc: Dave Jones <davej at redhat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1396860915.5170.5.camel@marge.simpson.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo at kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi at windriver.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c  | 13 +++++++------
 kernel/sched/sched.h |  9 +++++++++
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 964d4ef..356b3cc 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
 	/* If the task is part of a group prevent parallel updates to group stats */
 	if (p->numa_group) {
 		group_lock = &p->numa_group->lock;
-		spin_lock(group_lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(group_lock);
 	}
 
 	/* Find the node with the highest number of faults */
@@ -1589,7 +1589,7 @@ static void task_numa_placement(struct task_struct *p)
 			}
 		}
 
-		spin_unlock(group_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(group_lock);
 	}
 
 	/* Preferred node as the node with the most faults */
@@ -1694,7 +1694,8 @@ static void task_numa_group(struct task_struct *p, int cpupid, int flags,
 	if (!join)
 		return;
 
-	double_lock(&my_grp->lock, &grp->lock);
+	BUG_ON(irqs_disabled());
+	double_lock_irq(&my_grp->lock, &grp->lock);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++) {
 		my_grp->faults[i] -= p->numa_faults_memory[i];
@@ -1708,7 +1709,7 @@ static void task_numa_group(struct task_struct *p, int cpupid, int flags,
 	grp->nr_tasks++;
 
 	spin_unlock(&my_grp->lock);
-	spin_unlock(&grp->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&grp->lock);
 
 	rcu_assign_pointer(p->numa_group, grp);
 
@@ -1727,14 +1728,14 @@ void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
 	void *numa_faults = p->numa_faults_memory;
 
 	if (grp) {
-		spin_lock(&grp->lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&grp->lock);
 		for (i = 0; i < NR_NUMA_HINT_FAULT_STATS * nr_node_ids; i++)
 			grp->faults[i] -= p->numa_faults_memory[i];
 		grp->total_faults -= p->total_numa_faults;
 
 		list_del(&p->numa_entry);
 		grp->nr_tasks--;
-		spin_unlock(&grp->lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&grp->lock);
 		rcu_assign_pointer(p->numa_group, NULL);
 		put_numa_group(grp);
 	}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index f964add..4bcdcda 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1392,6 +1392,15 @@ static inline void double_lock(spinlock_t *l1, spinlock_t *l2)
 	spin_lock_nested(l2, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 }
 
+static inline void double_lock_irq(spinlock_t *l1, spinlock_t *l2)
+{
+	if (l1 > l2)
+		swap(l1, l2);
+
+	spin_lock_irq(l1);
+	spin_lock_nested(l2, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
+}
+
 static inline void double_raw_lock(raw_spinlock_t *l1, raw_spinlock_t *l2)
 {
 	if (l1 > l2)
-- 
2.0.2