[linux-yocto] [PATCH 2/8] mm: softdirty: make freshly remapped file pages being softdirty unconditionally
Yang Shi
yang.shi at windriver.com
Thu Aug 28 11:25:48 PDT 2014
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at openvz.org>
commit 0bf073315cb29d2e9e68b6c5da97862a519e3320 upstream
Hugh reported:
| I noticed your soft_dirty work in install_file_pte(): which looked
| good at first, until I realized that it's propagating the soft_dirty
| of a pte it's about to zap completely, to the unrelated entry it's
| about to insert in its place. Which seems very odd to me.
Indeed this code ends up being nop in result -- pte_file_mksoft_dirty()
operates with pte_t argument and returns new pte_t which were never used
after. After looking more I think what we need is to soft-dirtify all
newely remapped file pages because it should look like a new mapping for
memory tracker.
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov at openvz.org>
Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd at google.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul at parallels.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi at windriver.com>
---
mm/fremap.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/fremap.c b/mm/fremap.c
index d857364..6bf1044 100644
--- a/mm/fremap.c
+++ b/mm/fremap.c
@@ -82,13 +82,10 @@ static int install_file_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
ptfile = pgoff_to_pte(pgoff);
- if (!pte_none(*pte)) {
- if (pte_present(*pte) && pte_soft_dirty(*pte))
- pte_file_mksoft_dirty(ptfile);
+ if (!pte_none(*pte))
zap_pte(mm, vma, addr, pte);
- }
- set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, ptfile);
+ set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, pte_file_mksoft_dirty(ptfile));
/*
* We don't need to run update_mmu_cache() here because the "file pte"
* being installed by install_file_pte() is not a real pte - it's a
--
2.0.2
More information about the linux-yocto
mailing list