[linux-yocto] [PATCH 03/10] cfg/intel: Add Intel Vendor Specific enabler

[Darren Hart]

On 7/1/15 9:57 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> As part of the larger breaking up of x86 put the Intel Vendor Enablers
> in their own file
> 
> Signed-off-by: Saul Wold <sgw at linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.cfg | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.scc |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.cfg
>  create mode 100644 meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.scc
> 
> diff --git a/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.cfg b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.cfg
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..108022e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/cfg/kernel-cache/cfg/intel.cfg
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +# Config settings specific to intel processors
> +CONFIG_MICROCODE=y
> +CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL=y
> +CONFIG_MICROCODE_EARLY=y
> +CONFIG_MICROCODE_INTEL_EARLY=y
> +
> +
> +CONFIG_PROCESSOR_SELECT=y
> +CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL=y
> +
> +CONFIG_X86_EXTENDED_PLATFORM=y
> +CONFIG_X86_PLATFORM_DEVICES=y
> +CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MID=y
> +CONFIG_X86_INTEL_QUARK=y
> +CONFIG_X86_INTEL_LPSS=y

I was going to push back on LPSS, like with PCI and hotplug, but it's a
single option here, contained properly to intel.cfg, and unlikely to be
not wanted on any recent, current, or near future SoC as far as I can
tell.... so this is actually fine with me.


-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center