[linux-yocto] [PATCH 0000/1228] xilinx-zynqmp: add sdk patches

[qwang2]

On 7/31/19 5:13 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 19. 07. 19 21:12, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 9:36 AM Bruce Ashfield <bruce.ashfield at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 8:30 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>> On 16. 07. 19 21:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:19 AM Wei, Yunguo <yunguo.wei at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/8/2019 9:14 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 5:59 AM <quanyang.wang at windriver.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang at windriver.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Bruce,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am working on BSP xilinx-zynqmp.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you please help to merge these patches to:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> linux-yocto-dev standard/xilinx-zynqmp
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> These patches are picked from:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx.git xlnx_rebase_v4.19
>>>>>>> We already have a 4.19 branch based on Michal's tree, which was
>>>>>>> curated and selected for the soc support.
>>>>>>> Did you you look at the one in linux-yocto 4.19 ? Since it is a
>>>>>>> specifically selected set of patches and might be a better starting
>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Before I introduce a 5.x branch, I'd want to hear his opinion on the
>>>>>>> branch and the selections that you made, versus what he would have
>>>>>>> done.
>>>>>> Hi Bruce, Michal,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any further comments on it?
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try getting comments from Michal via another method, he may be on
>>>>> vacation. I'd still like to hear from him.
>>>>>
>>>>> But generally speaking, since the base is the same, I have no issues
>>>>> with the branch. I'll likely call the branch the same as we have in
>>>>> 4.19, but otherwise, will leave things as they are.
>>>> Xilinx is going to stay at 4.19 for the whole 2019 and new patches are
>>>> coming to our master branch and then they will be propagated to rebased
>>>> branch. After the initial patchset adding new patches is easy.
>>>> It means at some point in future I will sync current master with rebase
>>>> branch and ask you for adding these patches to yocto tree too.
>>>> If there is any immediate need to add/fix something there we can do it
>>>> earlier.
>>>> Please let me know what you think. I should be back in August.
>>> No issues on my end, that strategy works for me.
>>>
>>> I'll create the -dev (5.2) branches and stage the patches there.
>>> Incremental updates are fine, and we can handle them as they come.
>> See the standard/xlnx-soc branch in the -dev kernel for the results of
>> the merge.
>>
>> Bruce
> I have pushed the latest changed to v4.19 rebased branch.
> https://github.com/Xilinx/linux-xlnx/tree/xlnx_rebase_v4.19
>
> You should be able to take patches from it and apply them.
>
> Will be good to CC me patches which targets zynq/zynqmp.
OK, I will CC you.
>
> "drm: xlnx: zynqmp_dp: initialize delayed work before enable interrupts"
> should be added also to Xilinx tree but
> "driver: pcie: reset pcie device with MIO31 on xilinx-zcu102 platform"
> should be explained better especially in connection to mdelay/udelay
> used there.

I will make a detailed commit log when porting to 5.3.

>
> Thanks,
> Michal