[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 1/3] u-boot: Rename recipe to u-boot-fsl
Daiane Angolini
daiane.angolini at freescale.com
Fri Dec 14 08:50:07 PST 2012
On 12/14/2012 01:33 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> IMHO renaming the recipe is not the right way to do.
>
> The only two recipes which are in this set are:
>
> u-boot
> linux-mainline
>
> So my proposal is to use:
>
> u-boot-fslc
> linux-fslc
>
> What are people thoughts about it?
I see that we have 2 options.
One of then is the "most right" one - keep the name as is and teach
everyone how to add a bbappend, and PREFERED_PROVIDER and
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE for every single guy caming here because he has a
u-boot recipe in their recipe.
In the other hand, we may rename our u-boot recipe to
u-boot-somethingelse. This way, we have to face less support, and no
need to teach anyone how to fix their layer.
How I'm lazy, I would choose the renaming option.
If I'm wrong on any point, please let me know. I'm not sure I completely
understand the issue here, so I may be simplistic in my interpretation.
Daiane
Daiane
More information about the meta-freescale
mailing list