[meta-freescale] [meta-fsl-arm][PATCH 2/3] xf86-video-imxfb-vivante: Fix build with new Vivante GPU packaging
Fabio Estevam
festevam at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 14:54:58 PDT 2013
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio at ossystems.com.br> wrote:
> Yes; I think it makes sense but not usually done in Yocto as bisect is
> not expected to be fully working in Yocto repositories so I am not
> sure about how to handle it. I see pros and cons for both approaches.
> What your point of view?
In the projects I participate it is not allowed to introduce a commit
that builds the breakage, even if it will be fixed in the subsequent
commit and I agree that this is a good practice.
Or at least your commit could be like:
"Since commit xxxxx (gpu-viv-bin-mx6q: Rework package for a single
backend use ) the backend suffix from libraries
was removed, so remove the LDFLAGS to fix the build"
Anyway, I prefer not to break things at the first place.
More information about the meta-freescale
mailing list