[meta-ti] [RFC] u-boot recipe naming

[Andreas Müller]

On Friday, January 20, 2012 01:41:51 PM Koen Kooi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We currently have a problem with other layers including their own version
> of u-boot_2011.12.bb which confuses bitbake. To avoid such hassle in the
> future I'm going to propose using the kernel naming scheme for u-boot
> recipes as well:
> 
> u-boot-denx_2011.12.bb -> u-boot from git.denx.de master + patches
> u-boot-ti_git.bb -> u-boot from git.denx.de ti branch + patches
> u-boot-psp-<soc>_git.bb -> u-boot from psp tree for $SoC + patches e.g.
> u-boot-psp-am18x_git.bb
> 
> This should avoid filename based conflicts between layers and make it
> clearer which tree the recipe will be building.
> 
> Thoughts/flames/opinions?
> 
> regards,
> 
> Koen
Additional: How about exceeding the u-boot.inc ( linux.inc too? ) filenames by 
the layer name they live in, so other layers don't need to copy & paste ( 
happend yesterday after meta-ettus fallout - know it is worked around now ).

Andreas