[meta-ti] [RFC] u-boot recipe naming

[Tom Rini]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We currently have a problem with other layers including their own version of u-boot_2011.12.bb which confuses bitbake. To avoid such hassle in the future I'm going to propose using the kernel naming scheme for u-boot recipes as well:
>
> u-boot-denx_2011.12.bb -> u-boot from git.denx.de master + patches
> u-boot-ti_git.bb -> u-boot from git.denx.de ti branch + patches
> u-boot-psp-<soc>_git.bb -> u-boot from psp tree for $SoC + patches e.g. u-boot-psp-am18x_git.bb
>
> This should avoid filename based conflicts between layers and make it clearer which tree the recipe will be building.
>
> Thoughts/flames/opinions?

Works for me, but I do hope we need u-boot-ti_git.bb sparingly as I'm
just using that for requests for Albert to pull into u-boot-arm (it's
possible that stuff might stay in 'next' for a while, ie when merge
window closes but I don't want to lose stuff) so please make sure it's
marked as a rebasing git tree.

-- 
Tom