[meta-ti] [PATCH 1/3] matrix-gui-browser: port from arago overlay

Koen Kooi koen at dominion.thruhere.net
Fri Jan 27 11:47:29 PST 2012


Op 27 jan. 2012, om 20:39 heeft Denys Dmytriyenko het volgende geschreven:

> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 01:24:14PM +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> 
>> Op 27 jan. 2012, om 13:09 heeft Andreas M?ller het volgende geschreven:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Since meta-arago is supposed to be as empty as possible and matrix 
>>>> doesn't play well with others it's a bad fit for both meta-arago and 
>>>> meta-oe. Maybe we should split the meta-ti repo into 2 layers: one for 
>>>> BSP things (including sgx, dsp, etc) and one for 'sdk' things (matrix).
>>>> The idea is to keep reusable TI deliverables together without forcing 
>>>> people to use arago. Putting matrix in meta-arago would mean you can only 
>>>> use it with DISTRO=arago, which is a huge step backwards from the current 
>>>> situation.
>>> 
>>> I think splitting out BSP into an own layer is a good idea and sorry
>>> for another hijacking: This would be a good chance to make it
>>> independent of angstrom ( e.g ti-hw-bringup ).
>> 
>> Image reuse is the least of the issues, SOC_FAMILY is a much larger one.
> 
> Koen,
> 
> Can you please elaborate on the SOC_FAMILY issue you mentioned? Thanks.

We need support for it, only angstrom does at the moment. The big problem is that the solution can't be layer-local since other layers will use it as well. Having duplicates in OVERRIDES is a nightmare.


More information about the meta-ti mailing list