[meta-ti] meta-ti vs meta-texasinstruments

[Gary Thomas]

On 2012-03-06 06:39, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 6 mrt. 2012, om 14:35 heeft Gary Thomas het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On 2012-03-06 06:19, Enrico wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Gary Thomas<gary at mlbassoc.com>   wrote:
>>>> Why are there two layers, each seemingly providing support for
>>>> TI products (boards, tools, etc)?  They have a great overlap,
>>>> but many differences...
>>>>
>>>> Shouldn't there only be one such layer?  As is, the meta-texasinstruments
>>>> one seems to be rather out of date, but I'm not sure.
>>>
>>> url of these layers? Maybe it's just an old reference in your setup
>>> that is not getting updated (previously it was called
>>> meta-texasinstruments and then it became meta-ti).
>>
>> Indeed, the meta-texasinstruments one may just be left over chaff.
>>
>> That said, where is u-boot-fw-utils (assuming not meta-texasinstruments)?
>
> Hmm, let's look at the README and the layers it lists as requirements and take the first one, oe-core:
>
> http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=4a2543c0641f1df6d74c18cfe0c3ac3cfd50e60c

Which was missed by my simple search of "fw-utils" _inside_ the recipes, not
the recipe names themselves.

Thanks

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------