[meta-ti] question on meta-ti for yocto

[Richard Purdie]

On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 17:45 -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> That's not true. There are no hard dependencies on meta-angstrom any more. And 
> meta-oe is only needed to supply gcc-4.5 for now, until all the issues are 
> ironed out.
> 
> I've been making numerous builds past few weeks with different combination of 
> layers and besides few bugs I need to fix for the distro-less configuration, 
> was quite successful getting meta-ti work with oe-core WITHOUT meta-angstrom!
> 
> There are some systemd dependencies, but they are no longer hard ones. There 
> was discussion about moving beagle payload stuff off of meta-ti. But it should 
> no longer break things.

I've been going by the information I see and the contents of the meta-ti
README. Reading the above it looks like much progress is being made,
things are changing and I really do appreciate that happening!

> > The amount of confusion this is causing users is immense as we see from
> > new users and experienced ones alike. Whilst I know people have nodded
> > and agreed they're going to fix it, time goes on and we don't seem to
> > make much progress.
> > 
> > The biggest confusion factor out there at the moment is meta-ti, not
> > poky and I'd like to ask politely for people to get their act together.
> 
> See above, the work is being done. The first wave of people who complained 
> about those dependencies are now building their images. There are still 
> confused people, but we'll clear the message once all obstacles are resolved.

Great, thanks!

> Richard, Koen, please take your word-fight and name-calling offline! It's not 
> a proper place here. Thank you.

Well said and I agree with you! :)

The trouble is Koen keeps doing this and nobody in general replies. The
lack of a reply can be seen as to condone what was said and its
certainly leading to people getting more confused. I think a response
was appropriate.

I also do not mean to undermine the progress being made on meta-ti. I
hadn't heard much for a while but it looks like things are moving
forward and that is great to see.

Cheers,

Richard