[meta-ti] [PATCH 4/6] libdce: add version 1.6.5.3

Denys Dmytriyenko denys at ti.com
Fri Oct 12 12:19:37 PDT 2012


On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 12:53:21PM +0200, Enrico wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Dechesne <ndec13 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 1:40 AM, Enrico Butera <ebutera at users.berlios.de> wrote:
> > libdce tree contains both the linux side lib, and the ducati side DCE
> > code for now (which can't be rebuild completely for now, as we aren't
> > releasing all the bits/pieces for ducati side).
> >
> > we have been discussing about spliting this tree into 2 for better
> > clarity, so that might happen at some point..
> 
> I learned it the hard way some time ago, at my first attempt to add gst-ducati!

Enrico,

You'd be surprised, but I still keep your first attempt patches in my queue, 
waiting for a better moment to integrate them! :) Now, that we have the 
corresponding TI team assisting us, we should be able to get it done quickly!


> >> +require ../includes/ti-paths.inc
> >> +require ../includes/ti-staging.inc
> >
> > what is this for?
> 
> some copy/paste leftovers :D
> will delete them

Yeah, those are kind of specific to the way other teams package their 
components and are not really needed here.


> >> +inherit autotools
> >> +
> >> +DEPENDS = "libdrm"
> >> +RDEPENDS = "libdrm ti-firmware-ipu-dce"
> >
> > i would hope that libdrm is not needed in RDEPENDS, as it should be
> > handled automagically by shlibdeps.
> 
> I really don't know, if you are sure about that i will just remove it.

Yes, he is correct here - if you have a build dependency in DEPENDS which 
links against a library, you automatically get that run-time dependency in 
RDEPENDS, so no need to list it explicitly.

-- 
Denys



More information about the meta-ti mailing list