[meta-ti] Fix image recipes in meta-ti

[Cooper Jr., Franklin]

Unless the meta-angstrom dependency is fixed then I would see them having the same issue.

On Sep 1, 2012, at 4:14 PM, "Kridner, Jason" <jdk at ti.com<mailto:jdk at ti.com>> wrote:

Will meta-oe take the recipes?


-------- Original message --------
Subject: [meta-ti] Fix image recipes in meta-ti
From: "Cooper Jr., Franklin" <fcooper at ti.com<mailto:fcooper at ti.com>>
To: "meta-ti at yoctoproject.org<mailto:meta-ti at yoctoproject.org>" <meta-ti at yoctoproject.org<mailto:meta-ti at yoctoproject.org>>
CC:


When debugging issues in meta-arago I frequently try building recipes using  the meta-ti,meta-oe and oe-core layers. However, I always have to remove the following recipes due to “This recipe does not have the LICENSE field set” error:
cloud9-gfx-image.bb
cloud9-gnome-image.bb
cloud9-image.bb

The issue is these recipes have an include from meta-angstrom that provides this LICENSE field. Meta-ti should not have this dependency so these recipes should be fixed to address this. I personally do not think cloud9 related recipes that install  cloud9, nodejs, mplayer etc.. should even be in meta-ti which is a BSP layer but that is a completely different discussion. I also don’t believe pulling in the include file that is needed from meta-angstrom is also a reasonably solution. Either these recipes need to be fixed so that they can work in meta-ti with only a dependency on meta-oe and oe-core. Or remove the recipes from this layer and pull it into meta-angstrom which I believe is the best option.
Regards,
Franklin Cooper Jr.
Texas Instruments
Application Engineer
fcooper at ti.com<mailto:fcooper at ti.com>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/attachments/20120901/7256e0e2/attachment.html>