[meta-ti] [PATCH] recipes: Use 'packagegroup' instead of 'task'

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:26:14AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denys at ti.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 10:07:47AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> >> bring recipes in sync with OE-Core, task bbclass
> >> is now replaced by packagegroup.
> >>
> >> and task recipes are now called packagegroup_something
> >>
> >> diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc b/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc
> >> index 04bc987..96d6121 100644
> >> --- a/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc
> >> +++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/multi-kernel.inc
> >> @@ -117,5 +117,5 @@ do_deploy_append () {
> >>
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -do_compileconfigs[depends] += "u-boot-mkimage-native:do_populate_sysroot virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc:do_populate_sysroot virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX}:do_populate_sysroot"
> >> +do_compileconfigs[depends] += "u-boot-mkimage-native:do_populate_sysroot virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc:do_populate_sysroot"
> >
> > Why is this changed? Isn't gcc${KERNEL_CCSUFFIX} no longer useful?
> >
> 
> this should have been a separate commit.

Then you wouldn't mind if I skip that hunk?

> Its needed to accompany > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/35151/

Interesting. What's the status on that?

-- 
Denys