[meta-ti] RFC: 2 possible workarounds for recipes-misc dependency on Angstrom

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:36:20PM +0200, Enrico wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Maupin, Chase <chase.maupin at ti.com> wrote:
> > So really I think the question is do we have an agreement on "meta-beagle" or whatever it should be called, a timeline for it to be created and the recipes moved?  Let's make meta-ti be the foundation BSP that we can all build on top of and nothing more or less.
> 
> Sorry to jump into the discussion but...am i the only one that thinks
> that having meta-beagle, meta-panda, meta-whateverTIboard is crazy?

Not to argue that it's better, but how is it different from meta-cedartrail, 
meta-crownbay, meta-emenlow, meta-sugarbay and all the other Intel boards?

-- 
Denys