[meta-ti] RFC: 2 possible workarounds for recipes-misc dependency on Angstrom

[Enrico]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Koen Kooi <koen at dominion.thruhere.net> wrote:
>
>
> Op 17 sep. 2012 om 22:36 heeft Enrico <ebutera at users.berlios.de> het volgende geschreven:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Maupin, Chase <chase.maupin at ti.com> wrote:
>>> So really I think the question is do we have an agreement on "meta-beagle" or whatever it should be called, a timeline for it to be created and the recipes moved?  Let's make meta-ti be the foundation BSP that we can all build on top of and nothing more or less.
>>
>> Sorry to jump into the discussion but...am i the only one that thinks
>> that having meta-beagle, meta-panda, meta-whateverTIboard is crazy?
>
> Beagle is not a TI board

Oh come on you got my point ;)

Enrico