[meta-ti] should mesa_9.1.5.bbappend be upgraded to 9.1.6?

[Brian Hutchinson]

On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday at crashcourse.ca>wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
>
> ... snip ...
>
> > As a stop gap measure, I did just rename the bbappend to 9.1.6 and
> > that solved my mesa problem but then I had toolchain build
> > problems.  When I did a fresh checkout, I did not get the mesa error
> > for the mesa 9.1.5.
>
>   for now, since i'm building a non-graphical "core-image-minimal"
> image, i just masked out the entire "meta-ti/recipes-graphics"
> directory, but i'm sure that's not the cleanest way to solve this. :-)
>
>   so what is the underlying layer with which meta-ti should stay in
> sync? it seems both poky and oe-core have moved on to mesa_9.1.6,
> while meta-ti is still at 9.1.5_bbappend, at least on "master". so
> i'm assuming synchronization requires using tags, or a particular
> branch, or something like that.
>
>
I don't know.  My image is based off core-image-minimal and I don't need
graphics so I didn't look into it anymore when the fresh checkout of poky
master and meta-ti master worked (I also use meta-openembedded).

Regards,

Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/attachments/20130810/18fc1dc7/attachment.html>