[meta-ti] [PATCH 2/2] omap3-sgx-modules: Add v4.08.00.01 of the SGX modules

[Andreas Müller]

On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denys at ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:43:34AM +0100, Andreas Müller wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Andreas Müller
>> <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Andreas Müller
>> > <schnitzeltony at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Cooper Jr., Franklin <fcooper at ti.com> wrote:
>> >>> Yes I've got this working for me on danny. However, I do use a non x11 build which is most likely the reason why I am not having this problem.
>> >>>
>> >>> A related thread about possible issues with x11 distributions
>> >>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/2012-September/001502.html
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> Have fixed this - after testing I will send a follow up patch series
>> >> because I am really burning to see the X11 stuff...
>> >>
>> >> Andreas
>> > Aargh - during tests I ran into other issues with oe-core/meta-oe
>> > current HEAD so I can not do run-tests. Build-tested results are at
>> >
>> > https://gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-ti/commits/sgx-test
>> >
>> > As soon as HEADS are back and build working images I'll return on this...
>> >
>> OK I managed to build and am testing now. When loading pvr_drv X
>> complains for wrong ABI (is 10 expected 13). Is there a version of
>> Graphics SDK available with support for xserver 1.13? I saw
>> v4.08.00.02 supports xserver 1.12. Are there any other sources for the
>> userspace-driver part?
>
> Andreas,
>
> I just pushed v4.08.00.01. Please let us know if you have any further comments
> or patches.
>
> Currently, v4.08.00.02 has some issues compiling from the recipes, as
> historically recipes didn't use Graphics SDK's Makefiles - we will be
> reworking that soon. As well as we'll try to address installer's size issue.
>
> As of the xserver support - 1.12 from v4.08.00.02 is as good as it gets right
> now. While X11 support hasn't been the first priority for Graphics SDK lately,
> that might change in the near future...
>
> --
> Denys
I got them to build for X with kernel 3.2 (begleboard) and 3.5
(overo). This you can see at [1] - but it needs some cleanup. More or
less accidently I found that much of what I did is already available
at [2]. As said - run tests failed due to mismatching ABI version for
pvr_dri. So I stopped further activities and wait for later SDK with
matching ABI.

Andreas

[1] https://gitorious.org/schnitzeltony-oe-meta/meta-ti/commits/sgx-test
[2] https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-sdk-pvr/tree/4.08.00.02