[meta-ti] Which machine type to use for DaVinci DM6446 and TI816x?
Brian Hutchinson
b.hutchman at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 10:28:55 PDT 2013
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko <denys at ti.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 11:21:13AM -0400, Brian Hutchinson wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> Hey, Brian,
>
> Long time no see!
>
>
> > I have to support DaVinci DM6446, AM1808, OMAP-L138 and C6A816x which has
> > turned into TI816x in later silicon releases.
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out what conf/machine to use for the above SoC's.
> >
> > In Denzil, I see am389x-evm.conf and c6a816x-evm.conf and both include
> the
> > same ti816x.inc file, but I do not see support for this machine in Danny
> or
> > Dylan (unless I'm missing something). How should I go about using Dylan
> > with the ti816x?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.embedded.yocto.meta-ti/1544
>
>
> > For DaVinci DM6446, I don't see an obvious machine type that supports it
> > but I know that the DM6446, AM1808 and OMAP-L138 are all in the same
> ARM926
> > family (da850) so should I be using the am1808-evm.conf for DaVinci
> DM6446?
>
> DM6446 is quite different from OMAP-L138. Both AM180x and DA850 are just
> derivatives of OMAP-L138.
>
> Anyway, DM6446 is no longer supported, as it's a very old platform.
>
>
> > I've always used Arago or Angstrom for DM6446 support in the past and so
> > I'm not sure which .conf I should be using with meta-ti. My gut says use
> > am1808-evm.conf but I thought I should ask to be sure.
>
> --
> Denys
>
Hey Denys,
Wow, I wasn't expecting support to be dropped. I'm sure there is still a
bunch of people using it. I guess I could maybe maintain it if someone
would give pointers on how to go about it.
OK, so how about this ... I use the same u-boot and kernel that I'm
currently using (but built with the same toolchain to build the rootfs ...
meta-toolchain) but use am180x-evm to build the rootfs & packages of other
stuff I need? I mainly need to have the packages kept relatively up to
date (security patches etc.).
Do you see anything wrong with that approach? Same ABI right?
Regards,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-ti/attachments/20130710/785c45ac/attachment.html>
More information about the meta-ti
mailing list