[meta-ti] [PATCH] u-boot: disable SPL/MLO processing for omapl138 SOCs

[Denys Dmytriyenko]

On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 09:30:45AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:10:32PM -0400, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> 
> > From: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys at ti.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Denys Dmytriyenko <denys at ti.com>
> > ---
> >  recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb
> > index b326aa1..9da6f7d 100644
> > --- a/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb
> > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/u-boot_2014.07.bb
> > @@ -25,3 +25,6 @@ SRCREV = "76b21026ceb5a6a83fc53b0ecdf425f240318022"
> >  
> >  SPL_BINARY = "MLO"
> >  SPL_UART_BINARY = "u-boot-spl.bin"
> > +
> > +SPL_BINARY_omapl138 = ""
> > +SPL_UART_BINARY_omapl138 = ""
> 
> omapl138 is am18xx right?  SPL supports that.  The only issue is that we
> need to ship u-boot.ais which is a combo image.  If I'm looking at the
> right branch, the problem(s) right now are we don't use the right config
> target (da850_am18xxevm_config is what we want) and UBOOT_SUFFIX to
> "ais" (in the omapl138.inc file).

What's the difference between da850_config and da850_am18xxevm_config? The 
first one is what we used previously. Is the second one set ups the building 
of "ais" image?

As of UBOOT_SUFFIX, with hierarchical inclusion of different .inc files, it 
would be overwritten if defined in the machine config. Usually we end up 
specifying it in the machine-specific u-boot recipe. Let me take a look at it 
and see if we can move that var to the machine config...

-- 
Denys