[meta-ti] [PATCH] mmap-lld; Add new recipe for mmap lld
Maupin, Chase
chase.maupin at ti.com
Wed Nov 19 09:05:51 PST 2014
diff --git a/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld-test_git.bb b/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld-test_git.bb
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..41e46f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld-test_git.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "TI KEYSTONE MMAP driver test binaries "
+include mmap-lld.inc
+
+DEPENDS="common-csl-ip mmap-lld"
+RDEPENDS_${PN}="uio-module-drv"
+
+DEVICELIST = "k2h \
+ k2k \
+ k2e \
+"
I don't have a fundamental issue with a single recipe for all devices, but would it be easier to make this per device and then keep a generic binary name? i.e. a machine specific recipe that installs the binary build for that device into the file system?
+
+CHOICELIST = " yes \
+ no \
+"
+
+do_compile () {
+ for device in ${DEVICELIST}
+ do
+ make -f makefile_armv7 clean \
+ PDK_INSTALL_PATH="${STAGING_INCDIR}" \
+ DEVICE="$device" MPAX_SRC_DIR="${S}"
+ for choice in ${CHOICELIST}
+ do
+ make -f makefile_armv7 tests examples \
+ PDK_INSTALL_PATH=${STAGING_INCDIR} \
+ DEVICE="$device" MPAX_SRC_DIR="${S}" \
+ USEDYNAMIC_LIB="$choice"
+ done
What is the purpose for both choice options? Are you expecting users to use both?
+ done
+}
+
+do_install () {
+ for device in ${DEVICELIST}
+ do
+ make -f makefile_armv7 installbin \
+ PDK_INSTALL_PATH=${STAGING_INCDIR} \
+ DEVICE="$device" MPAX_SRC_DIR="${S}" \
+ INSTALL_BIN_BASE_DIR="${D}/${bindir}"
+ done
+}
diff --git a/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld.inc b/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld.inc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b8a5b32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld.inc
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+LICENSE = "BSD-3-Clause"
+
+COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "keystone"
+
+LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING.txt;md5=b3315b8190036fe1c6a8263d02e15606"
Nit pick here but can this checksum go after the LICENSE setting?
+
+
+BRANCH="master"
+SRC_URI = "git://git.ti.com/keystone-rtos/mmap-lld.git;destsuffix=git/ti/runtime/mmap;protocol=git;branch=${BRANCH}"
+# Commit correspond to DEV.MMAP.02.00.00.03 SRCREV =
+"601f9284c392f67bb7f69ed1a5df5231a43c3137"
I would put the SRCREV in the _git file, not in the .inc since you would expect the .inc to be common across all versions. I guess you are using the .inc to handle the different test vs driver recipes. Maybe a better idea would be a single recipe that builds both but package the driver as the default package and make a new PACKAGE for the test applications?
+
+PV="2.0.0"
+PR = "r0"
+
+S = "${WORKDIR}/git/ti/runtime/mmap"
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld_git.bb b/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld_git.bb
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..3a56a62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/recipes-bsp/mmap-lld/mmap-lld_git.bb
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+DESCRIPTION = "TI KEYSTONE mmap driver using Keystone MPAX Programming"
+include mmap-lld.inc
+
+DEPENDS="common-csl-ip"
+
+do_compile () {
+ make -f makefile_armv7 clean lib PDK_INSTALL_PATH=${STAGING_INCDIR}
+}
+
+do_install () {
+ make -f makefile_armv7 install PDK_INSTALL_PATH=${STAGING_INCDIR}
+INSTALL_INC_BASE_DIR=${D}/${includedir}
+INSTALL_LIB_BASE_DIR=${D}${libdir}
+}
--
1.7.9.5
--
_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
More information about the meta-ti
mailing list