[meta-ti] [PATCH 1/2] linux/cmem.inc: Support reserving memory for CMEM.
Denys Dmytriyenko
denys at ti.com
Tue May 19 10:58:48 PDT 2015
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:52:43PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
>
>
> On 5/19/2015 1:47 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:39:58PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>
> >>On 5/19/2015 1:32 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:26:05PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>On 5/19/2015 1:25 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>>>On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:23:06PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>>>On 5/18/2015 3:13 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:03:18PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>>>>>On 5/18/2015 2:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 08:20:58AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>To reserve contiguous memory for CMEM:
> >>>>>>>>>>* include the "recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc"
> >>>>>>>>>>* Set CMEM_BASE and CMEM_SIZE to the physical memory address and size,
> >>>>>>>>>> respectively, to reserve for CMEM.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Currently limited to reserving a single memory region used to create
> >>>>>>>>>>a single buffer pool of a single buffer.
> >>>>>>>>>Looks good. 2 comments below.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Jacob Stiffler <j-stiffler at ti.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>---
> >>>>>>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>>> recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> >>>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc
> >>>>>>>>>> create mode 100644 recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc b/recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc
> >>>>>>>>>>new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>index 0000000..207bdc6
> >>>>>>>>>>--- /dev/null
> >>>>>>>>>>+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/cmem.inc
> >>>>>>>>>>@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> >>>>>>>>>>+FILESEXTRAPATHS_append := ":${THISDIR}/linux"
> >>>>>>>>>Move the file into standard "files" directory and drop above line.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Ok.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>+SRC_URI += "file://cmem.dtsi"
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+CMEM_BASE ?= ""
> >>>>>>>>>>+CMEM_SIZE ?= ""
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+do_compileconfigs_prepend() {
> >>>>>>>>>Should this be do_configure_append() instead? It would probably be safer, as
> >>>>>>>>>do_compileconfigs() is specific to multi-kernel.inc and some kernel recipes
> >>>>>>>>>may not include it...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>I had noticed that do_configure() gets invoked multiple times.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>I'll try it as a do_configure_append() and make sure it will work.
> >>>>>>>Ah, you are right. Then you'd need to call this function uniquely like
> >>>>>>>do_setup_cmem() and then addtask it after do_patch before do_configure. It
> >>>>>>>looks like it should be safe to do it even before do_configure. It would be
> >>>>>>>nice to do it after do_configure, but it needs to be before do_compile and
> >>>>>>>also do_compileconfigs, while the latter one is only defined by multi-kernel
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>This should be called before do_create_srcipk(). But I suppose it
> >>>>>>should not be assumed that do_create_srcipk() will be run for a
> >>>>>>general kernel recipe.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Should do_setup_cmem() be a postfunc of do_configure()? For example:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>do_configure[postfuncs] += "do_setup_cmem"
> >>>>>Will it be called multiple times after each do_configure?
> >>>>>
> >>>>Sorry, I had meant do_patch().
> >>>BTW, are you sure you want it before create_srcipk? It won't package the
> >>>changes then...
> >>>
> >>I thought it would have to be done before create_srcipk, since
> >>create_srcipk pulls the ${S} directory into the sourceipk. If this
> >>is done after create_srcipk, then there will not be any way for
> >>these changes to be packaged, correct?
> >Oops, you are correct. I was thinking backwards...
> >So, do_create_srcipk is also being re-called in do_compile_prepend, so it
> >would pick up those changes.
> >
>
> But that is only for the case with the meta-arago bbappend, through
> copy-defconfig.inc.
And srcipk is specific to meta-arago as well...
> Any reason it would be better to make this change after do_configure()?
Nope, nothing specifically depending on do_configure here, AFAICS.
> >>>>>>>>>>+ if [ ! -z "${CMEM_BASE}" ]
> >>>>>>>>>>+ then
> >>>>>>>>>>+ cp ${WORKDIR}/cmem.dtsi ${S}/arch/arm/boot/dts/${MACHINE}-cmem.dtsi
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+ sed -i -e "s|__CMEM_BASE__|${CMEM_BASE}|g" \
> >>>>>>>>>>+ -e "s|__CMEM_SIZE__|${CMEM_SIZE}|g" \
> >>>>>>>>>>+ ${S}/arch/arm/boot/dts/${MACHINE}-cmem.dtsi
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+ for dts in ${KERNEL_DEVICETREE}
> >>>>>>>>>>+ do
> >>>>>>>>>>+ echo "#include \"${MACHINE}-cmem.dtsi\"" >> ${S}/arch/arm/boot/dts/${dts%.dtb}.dts
BTW, is that bashism at the end of the line ^^^^^^^^^^^
> >>>>>>>>>>+ done
> >>>>>>>>>>+ fi
> >>>>>>>>>>+}
> >>>>>>>>>>diff --git a/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi
> >>>>>>>>>>new file mode 100644
> >>>>>>>>>>index 0000000..6b1da99
> >>>>>>>>>>--- /dev/null
> >>>>>>>>>>+++ b/recipes-kernel/linux/linux/cmem.dtsi
> >>>>>>>>>>@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> >>>>>>>>>>+/ {
> >>>>>>>>>>+ reserved-memory {
> >>>>>>>>>>+ cmem_block_mem_0: cmem_block_mem at __CMEM_BASE__ {
> >>>>>>>>>>+ reg = <0x__CMEM_BASE__ 0x__CMEM_SIZE__>;
> >>>>>>>>>>+ no-map;
> >>>>>>>>>>+ status = "okay";
> >>>>>>>>>>+ };
> >>>>>>>>>>+ };
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+ cmem {
> >>>>>>>>>>+ compatible = "ti,cmem";
> >>>>>>>>>>+ #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>>>>>>>>+ #size-cells = <0>;
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+ status = "okay";
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+ cmem_block_0: cmem_block at 0 {
> >>>>>>>>>>+ reg = <0>;
> >>>>>>>>>>+ memory-region = <&cmem_block_mem_0>;
> >>>>>>>>>>+ cmem-buf-pools = <1 0x__CMEM_SIZE__>;
> >>>>>>>>>>+ };
> >>>>>>>>>>+ };
> >>>>>>>>>>+
> >>>>>>>>>>+};
> >>>>>>>>>>--
> >>>>>>>>>>1.7.9.5
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>--
> >>>>>>>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>meta-ti mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
> >>>>>>>>>>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti
>
More information about the meta-ti
mailing list