[meta-ti] [rocko/master][PATCH] gcc-arm-none-eabi: extend to nativesdk class

[Jacob Stiffler]

On 2/21/2019 9:29 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:12:06AM -0500, Jacob Stiffler wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Stiffler <j-stiffler at ti.com>
>> ---
>>   ...1-update.bb => gcc-arm-none-eabi_6-2017-q1-update.bb} | 16 ++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>   rename recipes-ti/devtools/{gcc-arm-none-eabi-native_6-2017-q1-update.bb => gcc-arm-none-eabi_6-2017-q1-update.bb} (67%)
>>
>> diff --git a/recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-arm-none-eabi-native_6-2017-q1-update.bb b/recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-arm-none-eabi_6-2017-q1-update.bb
>> similarity index 67%
>> rename from recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-arm-none-eabi-native_6-2017-q1-update.bb
>> rename to recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-arm-none-eabi_6-2017-q1-update.bb
>> index 1140f27..c10ee16 100644
>> --- a/recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-arm-none-eabi-native_6-2017-q1-update.bb
>> +++ b/recipes-ti/devtools/gcc-arm-none-eabi_6-2017-q1-update.bb
>> @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ LICENSE = "GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception & GPLv3"
>>   
>>   LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://share/doc/gcc-arm-none-eabi/license.txt;md5=c224e429f53a1a6ce70bf8986ea2990b"
>>   
>> -inherit native
>>   require recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc
>>   
>>   SRC_URI = "https://developer.arm.com/-/media/Files/downloads/gnu-rm/6_1-2017q1/gcc-arm-none-eabi-6-2017-q1-update-linux.tar.bz2;name=gcc-arm-none"
>> @@ -13,6 +12,17 @@ SRC_URI[gcc-arm-none.sha256sum] = "e7aad2579f02e3b095c6d7899ca5e6a70cfa9b8a8cbd6
>>   
>>   S = "${WORKDIR}/gcc-arm-none-eabi-6-2017-q1-update"
>>   
>> +# only x86_64 is supported
>> +python __anonymous() {
>> +    host_arch = d.getVar("HOST_ARCH")
>> +
>> +    if host_arch != "x86_64":
>> +        pkgn = d.getVar("PN")
>> +        pkgv = d.getVar("PV")
>> +
>> +        raise bb.parse.SkipPackage("%s-%s ONLY supported for x86_64 target" % (pkgn, pkgv))
>> +}
>> +
> I've been thinking about this one.
> Would it be better to have a common .inc file and 2 one-line native and
> nativesdk recipes that include that .inc file, and avoid __anonymous()
> function altogether?
>

Would COMPATIBLE_HOST be more appropriate here? It appears that it will 
have the same effect as this anonymous function.


>
>>   do_install() {
>>       install -d ${D}${GCC_ARM_NONE_TOOLCHAIN_RECIPE}
>>       cp -r ${S}/. ${D}${GCC_ARM_NONE_TOOLCHAIN_RECIPE}
>> @@ -20,4 +30,6 @@ do_install() {
>>   
>>   FILES_${PN} = "${GCC_ARM_NONE_TOOLCHAIN_RECIPE}/*"
>>   
>> -INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "already-stripped"
>> +INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "already-stripped libdir staticdev"
>> +
>> +BBCLASSEXTEND = "native nativesdk"
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> -- 
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-ti mailing list
>> meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti