[meta-xilinx] Introduction and feedback on meta-xilinx
Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
manjukumar.harthikote-matha at xilinx.com
Tue Nov 24 17:12:06 PST 2015
On 11/24/2015 03:36 PM, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:12 PM, Manjukumar Harthikote Matha
> <manjukumar.harthikote-matha at xilinx.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> My name is Manju, I have recently joined Xilinx Inc and will be working on
>> meta-xilinx layer to provide continuous support and integration. Nathan has
>> been helping out to a lot to maintain this layer, I will be working along
>> with him to provide the support for this layer.
>>
>> Our near term goals for meta-xilinx are
>>
>> 1. OSL releases based on meta-xilinx
>>
>
> I don't understand how this would work, and it feels like an inversion
> of the upstream-downstream relationship. Shouldn't meta-xilinx pull
> from OSL sources as appropriate and use an appropriate release, in
> much that same way it does with the major mainline sources? OSL is the
> upstream for those components and has it's own release schedule which
> should not need to depend on a downstream. Is that schedule still
> based on Xilinx tool releases?
>
Hi Peter,
Our plan was to use all the tagged releases from linux-xlnx, u-boot-xlnx
and Xilinx toolchain to build the OSL images.
For example we would use v2015.3 tag from all the sources(linux-xlnx,
u-boot-xlnx) and use v2015.3 Xilinx toolchain to build OSL images. Once
the images are built and tested, we will tag meta-xilinx as well.
Anything incorrect with this approach?
Yes OSL release schedule will be based on Xilinx tool releases.
Thanks
Manju
> Regards,
> Peter
>
>> 2. Updates for toolchain, kernel versions, Yocto versions etc.
>>
>> 3. Support for UltraScale+ MPSoC platforms (Machine definitions for ZC1751,
>> ZCU102 etc)
>>
More information about the meta-xilinx
mailing list