[meta-xilinx] [PATCH v1] qemuzynmp: Add the qemuzynqmp machine

Nathan Rossi nathan at nathanrossi.com
Wed Jun 15 07:25:08 PDT 2016


On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Alistair Francis
<alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM, Nathan Rossi <nathan at nathanrossi.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Alistair Francis
>> <alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Alistair Francis
>>> <alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 6:27 AM, Nathan Rossi <nathan at nathanrossi.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:20 AM, Alistair Francis
>>>>> <alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Alistair Francis
>>>>>> <alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Peter Crosthwaite
>>>>>>> <crosthwaitepeter at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Nathan Rossi <nathan at nathanrossi.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Alistair Francis
>>>>>>>>> <alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Nathan Rossi <nathan at nathanrossi.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Alistair Francis
>>>>>>>>>>> <alistair.francis at xilinx.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Add the qemuzynqmp machine based on the physical ZCU02 revB board.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alistair,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So I am a little confused, is this machine supposed to emulate the
>>>>>>>>>>> ep108 (the args to QEMU appear to be for the ep108) or the zcu102? or
>>>>>>>>>>> are both able to be emulated?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Nathan,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This machine is supposed to be emulating the ZCU102.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At the moment we only have the EP108 in upstream QEMU. It isn't worth
>>>>>>>>>> adding a ZCU102 model upstream yet as at the moment we don't have
>>>>>>>>>> enough modeled upstream to notice any differences between the boards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Ah ok, so in the future QEMU will have models for both the EP108 and
>>>>>>>>> the ZCU102 boards. In that case I don't actually see a need for a
>>>>>>>>> 'qemuzynqmp' machine, since the ep108-zynqmp already provides the
>>>>>>>>> setup for QEMU. The same can be done for the zcu102-zynqmp board, this
>>>>>>>>> would also make it easier to maintain consistency (aka changes only
>>>>>>>>> need to be made to the zcu102-zynqmp machine).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1, qemuzynq as well as the "zynq" machine model in upstream QEMU are
>>>>>>>> legacy convention that we should replace with concrete boards going
>>>>>>>> forward.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ok, I'll look into adding a ZCU102 machine similar to what we do for the EP108.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I run the EP108 on QEMU? I can't find how I can start QEMU with Yocto.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is no runqemu support though the ep108 machine is setup to build
>>>>> qemu-native for use. But there was a guide created back when first
>>>>> adding zynqmp, essentially it is manually running QEMU with the
>>>>> correct args. http://www.wiki.xilinx.com/Yocto+for+zynqmp
>>>>
>>>> Ok, but I'm looking for adding runqemu support to Yocto. The way that
>>>> everyone else seems to do it is by architecture and not by board so I
>>>> think that is my only option.
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a better idea of adding runqemu support?
>>>
>>> This has been accepted in poky master branch with this commit:
>>> commit ff3bc6c61f5946aa5e91a77442d828ec1a03387d
>>> Author: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at xilinx.com>
>>> Date:   Thu May 12 14:37:39 2016 -0700
>>>
>>>     runqemu: Add suport for qemuzynqmp
>>>
>>>     (From OE-Core rev: d2a7c1db9bff6ae3844e3d017e94f29d1501bf57)
>>>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at xilinx.com>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton at intel.com>
>>>     Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org>
>>>
>>>
>>> Can we work on merging this in meta-xilinx now?
>>
>> I will accept the addition of this machine given that it will only
>> exist for the purposes of runqemu, and it will be removed in the
>> future once runqemu is able to handle using the actual machine
>> targets. But there should be no specific configuration/overrides for
>> this machine, it should be equivalent to the target QEMU model, in
>> this case ep108-zynqmp.
>
> Agreed! I would much rather have EP108 and ZCU102 machines which can
> boot on QEMU, but that doesn't seem to be how the rest of Yocto works.
>
>>
>> But between this patch, your patch to runqemu and that with qemu 2.6.0
>> zynqmp does not boot correctly. I don't see a point in merging this
>> addition until all parts are working as expected. This means that
>> runqemu should be setup to direct boot the kernel, as this works fine
>> with qemu 2.5 (and should also work fine with 2.6 once the cpu bring
>> up issue is resolved).
>
> How are you testing with QEMU 2.6? I am unable to build images with
> meta-xilinx and poky both at master.

Some of the components in meta-xilinx still don't support gcc 6 yet.
So make sure you specify GCCVERSION = "5.%" in your local.conf.

If you get a task hash mismatch error on the core-image-* task, just
re-run bitbake. I believe there is a patch for oe-core to fix it on
the oe-core list (it relates to having cpio and cpio.gz.u-boot in the
IMAGE_FSTYPES).

Regards,
Nathan

>
> Thanks,
>
> Alistair
>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> With regards to this patch, please change it so that it is just
>> including the ep108 machine. Something like the following in
>> qemuzynqmp.conf.
>>
>> MACHINEOVERRIDES =. "ep108-zynqmp:"
>> require conf/machine/ep108-zynqmp.conf
>>
>> As for setting the "QEMU_DTB", this can be set in the ep108 conf. I
>> would also suggest using the kernel_devicetree/imagetype to set it.
>>
>> QEMU_DTB = "${KERNEL_IMAGETYPE}-${@os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(d.getVar("KERNEL_DEVICETREE",
>> True)))[0]}"
>>
>> As for the kernel changes, that kernel config is broken for QEMU.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nathan
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-xilinx mailing list
>> meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx



More information about the meta-xilinx mailing list