[meta-xilinx] Integration of PL device in the Device Tree (Yocto)
Giuseppe Di Guglielmo
giuseppe.diguglielmo at gmail.com
Wed Apr 19 11:49:32 PDT 2017
Jeff,
I do not know yet if I want to go to that extent. For sure, I have my own
PL devices and their device drivers. I was wondering if there is a stardar
way in Yocto to patch:
build/tmp/work/zc702_zynq7-poky-linux-gnueabi/u-boot-xlnx/v2016.07-xilinx-v2016.3+gitAUTOINC+95e11f6eb4-r0/git/arch/arm/dts/zynq-zc702.dts
(for example) with my own DTS node for a specific PL device.
Peter, I am
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Jean-Francois Dagenais <
jeff.dagenais at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 19, 2017, at 14:35, Giuseppe Di Guglielmo <
> giuseppe.diguglielmo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am familiar with the "manula" flow for the device tree compilation
> (dts/dtsi, dct, etc.) but I do not know how to integrate my own device
> using the Yocto flow. I am using a Zynq (zc702) board. Do you have any
> reference or suggestion?
>
>
> We have a forked clone of the linux-xlnx kernel where we maintain our
> custom (including PL nodes) dts file.
>
> It makes sense since we also maintain custom drivers and mods.
>
> I mad a linux-abc recipe which is copied from linux-yocto-custom.bb, then
> I use defconfigs.
>
> I manually have to track which linux repo sha-1 I use when I change my
> kernel or merge in linux-xlnx changes, as well as have to observe how the
> resulting .config of meta-xilinx's linux-xlnx recipe changes to maintain
> our defconfigs. It's a trade-off. For me the advantage is full control and
> very easy to predict and change.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/meta-xilinx/attachments/20170419/a18a286e/attachment.html>
More information about the meta-xilinx
mailing list