[meta-xilinx] SPI problem
Arno Steffens
star at gmx.li
Wed May 10 00:18:03 PDT 2017
Thanks Mike for the feedback.
It is an OnSemi Phyton camera chip.
Unfortunately FPGA is not suitable solution for me. The layout is already fixed and I am not an FPGA expert.
Checking the SPI registers in Technical Manual: it seems that there is no separate setting for CPOL/CPH for MOSI and MISO.
The only way I see is to send address, keep CS low, change SPI mode, read.
But there is another limitation. In struct spi_ioc_transfer there is a setting: bits_per_word. I need 10 for doing that
as described for the first part (9 bit adress + 1 r/w bit). This returns an error "could not transmit data". Any value expect 8 is returning an error.
Is this a limitation by hardware or an issue in driver, which can be fixed?
Best regards
Arno
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 09. Mai 2017 um 15:14 Uhr
> Von: "Mike Looijmans" <mike.looijmans at topic.nl>
> An: meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> Betreff: Re: [meta-xilinx] SPI problem
>
> It would help a lot if you'd disclose what chip you're trying to communicate
> with. (My wild guess would be a maxim ultrasound chip, am I far of the mark here?)
>
> Are you sure this isn't just compatible with existing SPI mode/phase settings?
>
> And you have a huge FPGA at your disposal if you have a Xilinx device of any
> kind. I'd suggest just solving this in a bit of FPGA logic instead of in
> userspace C code.
>
>
>
> On 09-05-17 14:54, Arno Steffens wrote:
> > I have a rather strange SPI protocol to run: write and read use different edges to sample.
> > See image:
> >
> > I configured the spi like that:
> >
> > static u8 mode_wr = 0;
> > static u8 mode_rd = 1;
> >
> > ret = ioctl(file_spi0, SPI_IOC_WR_MODE, &mode_wr);
> > if (ret == -1)
> > printf("can't set spi mode");
> >
> > ret = ioctl(file_spi0, SPI_IOC_RD_MODE, &mode_rd);
> > if (ret == -1)
> > printf("can't get spi mode");
> >
> >
> > The transfer itself runs via:
> >
> > ret = ioctl(file_spi0, SPI_IOC_MESSAGE(1), &transfer);
> >
> > But it seems, that only SPI_IOC_WR_MODE has an effect for both, write and read.
> > Is this a limitation of hardware, bug in driver or my bug?
> >
> > So I have to chose either sending correct address or receive correct data.
> > For only mode=1 and adress=0 it works fully (as with constant 0 sampling edge is not of importance).
> >
> > (as in the struct spi_ioc_transfer only bits_per_word = 8 are allowed, I use a 4 byte transfer (32bit) for these 9+1+16=26 bit.)
> > From what I see in Osci this seems to be fine, although it is some bit-fiddling.
> >
> > Best regards
> > Arno
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mike Looijmans
> System Expert
>
> TOPIC Products
> Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
> Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
> Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
> E-mail: mike.looijmans at topicproducts.com
> Website: www.topicproducts.com
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>
>
> Join our presentation at Electronics & Applications 2017:
> FPGA for real-time data processing, subject “Hardware platform for industrial ultrasound steel plate Inspection” (Topic Projects - Herman Kusters, 1st June 10 AM)
>
> Visit http://eabeurs.nl/author/612884/ for more information
>
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-xilinx mailing list
> meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
>
More information about the meta-xilinx
mailing list