[meta-xilinx] Custom u-boot-xlnx defconfig breaks spl/u-boot-spl recipe?

[Nathan Rossi]

On 22 November 2017 at 01:28, Giordon Stark <kratsg at gmail.com> wrote:
> Indeed. I'm now realizing that `make menuconfig` isn't really inheriting
> from the xilinx_zynqmp defconfig board at all. So I'm going to copy that
> file, and disable all the SPL/SDHCI support there. Thanks!
>
> [side note: why does bitbake -c menuconfig not work for u-boot-xlnx?]

It is more that u-boot.inc in oe-core doesn't support menuconfig
rather that u-boot-xlnx not supporting it. I think this stack overflow
answer covers the details and solutions.
https://stackoverflow.com/a/43222625

Also keep in mind that u-boot still has not fully switched from header
configs to kconfig, so you might still have to config with #defines
for certain features.

Regards,
Nathan

>
> Giordon
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:25 AM Nathan Rossi <nathan at nathanrossi.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 22 November 2017 at 01:12, Giordon Stark <kratsg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Here's the log file:
>> > https://gist.github.com/355ccc2aecb8887a03699d68b5a8c2b5
>> >
>> > and here's the defconfig patch that I applied to u-boot-xlnx:
>> > https://gist.github.com/07ade34baf39b8717d879760a15a274c (adds a
>> > <machine>_defconfig where machine=gfex-prototype3). I'm not sure what
>> > went
>> > wrong...
>>
>> Your config is missing 'CONFIG_ZYNQ_SDHCI=y'. But you enable MMC
>> options specifically 'CONFIG_SPL_MMC_SUPPORT=y'.
>>
>> >
>> > Right now, my machine configuration is somewhat bare, and I haven't
>> > actually
>> > enabled SPL yet. That said, it's curious I'm seeing a problem with that
>> > when
>>
>> Your config says otherwise 'CONFIG_SPL=y'. :)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nathan
>>
>> > changing out the defconfig?
>> >
>> > Giordon
>> >
>> > --
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > meta-xilinx mailing list
>> > meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
>> > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
>> >