[meta-xilinx] Why no support for FSBL?

[Mike Looijmans]

The "open source" way is to avoid the FSBL (and in fact, all of 
meta-xilinx-tools) and use u-boot SPL instead. All functionality provided by 
the fsbl/bootgen flow is provided by u-boot SPL already.


On 20-11-17 22:08, Peter Smith wrote:
> Hi, I’m aware of the meta-xilinx-tools layer, but this needs you to have the 
> Xilinx SDK installed (unless I’m mistaken), I was wondering ion there were any 
> plans to create support in meta-xilinx for building the FSBL without the need 
> for the SDK dependency. Peter
> 
>> On 20 Nov 2017, at 21:05, Giordon Stark <kratsg at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:kratsg at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi (resending from right address),
>>
>> You can indeed build the FSBL + boot.bin using the meta-xilinx-tools layer: 
>> https://github.com/Xilinx/meta-xilinx-tools
>>
>> Giordon
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 3:03 PM Peter Smith <salerio at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:salerio at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     A question, I was wondering why there is no support for building FSBL in
>>     a similar way to that provided by meta-xilinx for the PMU firmware, is
>>     there a technical reason or is it just one of those things that has not
>>     yet been got around to? Thanks in advance Peter.
>>     --
>>     

Kind regards,

Mike Looijmans
System Expert

TOPIC Products
Materiaalweg 4, NL-5681 RJ Best
Postbus 440, NL-5680 AK Best
Telefoon: +31 (0) 499 33 69 79
E-mail: mike.looijmans at topicproducts.com
Website: www.topicproducts.com

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail



_______________________________________________
>>     meta-xilinx mailing list
>>     meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org <mailto:meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org>
>>     https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx
>>
> 
> 
>