[meta-xilinx] [PATCH 9/9] zynqmp-pmu: Remove class that uses a multilib hack to build standalone components

[Manjukumar Harthikote Matha]

Hi Martin/Jean,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: meta-xilinx-bounces at yoctoproject.org [mailto:meta-xilinx-
> bounces at yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Martin Siegumfeldt
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 11:58 AM
> To: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais at gmail.com>
> Cc: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego <alejandr at xilinx.com>; meta-
> xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH 9/9] zynqmp-pmu: Remove class that uses a
> multilib hack to build standalone components
> 
> Hi Jean-Francois,
> 
> Appreciate your input, however, since we don't use meta-xilinx-tools, the
> workaround of a dual dependency (from both image- and u-boot) towards PMUFW
> appears more feasible for us.
> 

This is something that should be fixed in OE-core, we are working on it

Thanks,
Manju

> Thanks,
> Martin
> ________________________________________
> From: Jean-Francois Dagenais <jeff.dagenais at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 2:31:30 PM
> To: Martin Siegumfeldt
> Cc: Alejandro Enedino Hernandez Samaniego; meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> Subject: Re: [meta-xilinx] [PATCH 9/9] zynqmp-pmu: Remove class that uses a
> multilib hack to build standalone components
> 
> On Dec 12, 2018, at 3:21 AM, Martin Siegumfeldt
> <mns at gomspace.com<mailto:mns at gomspace.com>> wrote:
> 
> It looks to me as Manju's proposal of adding it as an image dependency may work
> when building the image, but appears to be subject to a race condition between
> pmu-firmware and virtual/bootloader.
> 
>  I instigated the idea to transform the fsbl build from a class to a proper recipe and
> tying it the the wic stage using. I then had to resolve this same race and if I
> remember correctly, the fix looked like this:
> 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/meta-xilinx@yoctoproject.org/msg02458.html
> 
> Not sure if it applies to your specific situation here. I have not invested much time in
> the multi-config stuff. I resorted to meta-xilinx-tools a while back, managed to
> "make it work" in our CI docker environment and have not looked back since.
> --
> _______________________________________________
> meta-xilinx mailing list
> meta-xilinx at yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-xilinx