[meta-xilinx] pmu-firmware configure failure

[Jean-Francois Dagenais]

Thanks for the comeback Luca.

> On Jun 3, 2019, at 03:47, Luca Ceresoli <luca at lucaceresoli.net> wrote:
> 
> Not really I'm afraid, but I tried building a pmufw now without
> multiconfig and it succeeds in master, thud and the shiny new
> rel-v2019.01 branch on xilinx's github and they all succeed.
> 
> Which commit are you using?
v2019.1
> Does a non-multiconfig setup work?
Will try this tomorrow.

In the mean time, I inspected copy_bsp.sh more carefully and it seems that commit 6aa787afce5ae454ce0a072fbf93e47e3960ada1 (and ae0d2a0989e3855d2044ab55dabc78ff35e38137 ??? ) removes lib/sw_services/xilsecure/src/xsecure_sha2_pmu.a so I am really wondering how this: https://github.com/Xilinx/embeddedsw/blob/86e2a1940f997f291ea5c1628f3c8a945133f100/lib/sw_apps/zynqmp_pmufw/misc/copy_bsp.sh#L93 would work for anyone!

Luca, you say it works for you on 2019.1, have you tried with a really clean workdir for pmu-firmware (bitbake pmu-firmware -c cleanall)? (Just to be sure)

...And what's happening in the embeddedsw repo?? There is a branch called release-v2019.1 but there is a fork from commit 6d04739c1ddc8727911e8b14163336c86ceafa10 where almost all commits are repeated and there's a tag xilinx-v2019.1 on top. The two branches are almost identical. A few differences in pdfs, licenses and htmls and an extra lib/sw_services/xilsem directory on the xilinx-v2019.1 side.

What gives?? How confusing is this! Which are we suppose to use? Don't get me wrong... I am glad I can access the code here. ;) But it looks like Xilinx is using some patch/apply workflow internally and it's not working tip top.

Cheers and thanks for the help guys!
/jfd