[meta-xilinx] SPL->ATF->Linux
Jean-Francois Dagenais
jeff.dagenais at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 06:24:37 PDT 2019
Hi Michal,
> On Jun 20, 2019, at 08:18, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have not a problem with this. I just retest it on zcu104.
> my bootgen version is not capable to work with Image. It should be
> Image.bin.
What is different between Image and Image.bin? I could not find the expression in any of the linux/arch/arm64/...Makefiles.
Is it just Image renamed to Image.bin and this somehow makes a difference to bootgen? I switched to the Image-mymachine.bin symlink in my DEPLOYDIR and it makes no difference. I also tried loading my DTB at the same address as you, no difference, of course.
I am booting on SD, are you?
I see two FSBL banners in your pastebin (https://pastebin.com/Um1vmqpc)
Xilinx Zynq MP First Stage Boot Loader
Release 2019.1 May 24 2019 - 18:30:01
Xilinx Zynq MP First Stage Boot Loader
Release 2019.1 May 24 2019 - 18:30:01
PMU Firmware 2019.1 May 24 2019 18:28:19
PMU_ROM Version: xpbr-v8.1.0-0
NOTICE: ATF running on XCZU7EG/EV/silicon v4/RTL5.1 at 0xfffea000
Shooting in the dark here... but is the FSBL copying itself to RAM then restarting? Or did you just copy/pasted two lines by mistake?
Could there be some configuration missing from my kernel defconfig perhaps? (I will investigate this now.) Or some bad/missing configuration from our handoff file? I am still using the one generated by vivado 2018.3. Should we align this now to be sure?
I will try and build these products for zcu104 then do deep comparisons of config files and generated code. Perhaps if I can swap in my psu_init.c/h I could try and boot it on my board...
Anyway thanks for answering my questions. I will really make sure to send in patches for this alternate boot flow.
Cheers!
More information about the meta-xilinx
mailing list