[meta-xilinx] SPL->ATF->Linux

Jean-Francois Dagenais jeff.dagenais at gmail.com
Thu Jun 20 06:24:37 PDT 2019


Hi Michal,

> On Jun 20, 2019, at 08:18, Michal Simek <michal.simek at xilinx.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have not a problem with this. I just retest it on zcu104.
> my bootgen version is not capable to work with Image. It should be
> Image.bin.

What is different between Image and Image.bin? I could not find the expression in any of the linux/arch/arm64/...Makefiles.

Is it just Image renamed to Image.bin and this somehow makes a difference to bootgen? I switched to the Image-mymachine.bin symlink in my DEPLOYDIR and it makes no difference. I also tried loading my DTB at the same address as you, no difference, of course.

I am booting on SD, are you?

I see two FSBL banners in your pastebin (https://pastebin.com/Um1vmqpc)
Xilinx Zynq MP First Stage Boot Loader 
Release 2019.1   May 24 2019  -  18:30:01
Xilinx Zynq MP First Stage Boot Loader 
Release 2019.1   May 24 2019  -  18:30:01
PMU Firmware 2019.1	May 24 2019   18:28:19
PMU_ROM Version: xpbr-v8.1.0-0
NOTICE:  ATF running on XCZU7EG/EV/silicon v4/RTL5.1 at 0xfffea000

Shooting in the dark here... but is the FSBL copying itself to RAM then restarting? Or did you just copy/pasted two lines by mistake?

Could there be some configuration missing from my kernel defconfig perhaps? (I will investigate this now.) Or some bad/missing configuration from our handoff file? I am still using the one generated by vivado 2018.3. Should we align this now to be sure?

I will try and build these products for zcu104 then do deep comparisons of config files and generated code. Perhaps if I can swap in my psu_init.c/h I could try and boot it on my board...

Anyway thanks for answering my questions. I will really make sure to send in patches for this alternate boot flow.

Cheers!


More information about the meta-xilinx mailing list