[poky] [PATCH 2/2] libc-package.bbclass: should not rm scsi/*.h

[Tom Rini]

On 01/15/2011 04:50 AM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
> Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 15 jan 2011, om 12:23 heeft Dexuan Cui het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> {e}glibc should install the scsi/*.h files, which are needed by hal.
>>> Currently hal can build because eglibc-initial (which has its own
>>> do_install) installs the files. In future eglibc will have its own
>>> sysroot, so hal
>>> won't build.

Unrelated, is it on the roadmap already to upgrade things to use 
devicekit rather than hal?

>>> BTW: in OE side, eglibc's do_install also doesn't remove the files.
>>
>> As some background info: There's a conflict between
>> linux-libc-headers-dev and libc-dev when installing on the target. In
>> OE we do this instead:
>>
>> koen at dominion:/OE/org.openembedded.dev$ grep scsi
>> recipes/linux-libc-headers/ -rn
>> recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.32.bb:23:     rm -f
>> ${D}${exec_prefix}/include/scsi/scsi.h
>> recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.31.bb:23:     rm -f
>> ${D}${exec_prefix}/include/scsi/scsi.h
>> recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.34.bb:42:     rm -f
>> ${D}${exec_prefix}/include/scsi/scsi.h
> My understanding is:
> Linux kernel should not export these files: in OE side see 91d3d92a acked by you. :-)
> So {e}glibc should supply the files -- previously poky did supply, but 7379ee77 removed the files -- I think this is incorrect.
>
> BTW: in poky, we can see linux-libc-headers_2.6.36.bb also correctly removes the file.

Correct.  The kernel (incorrectly) re-introduced exporting <scsi/scsi.h>.

-- 
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation