[poky] Is the grammar of .la files changed in new libtool 2.4?
Lu, Lianhao
lianhao.lu at intel.com
Tue Jan 25 21:56:52 PST 2011
Hi Scott,
I'm wondering whether the grammar of the .la files generated by new libtool 2.4 is different from the old ones. Take the file libxcb-res.la generated by libxcb for example, it contains a line:
dependency_libs=' =/usr/lib/libxcb.la =/usr/lib/libXau.la'
While in the old libxcb.la file, this line appeared to be
dependency_libs=' /usr/lib/libxcb.la /usr/lib/libxcb.la'
Is the "=" a new grammar for liblool 2.4? Because in meta-toolchain, it needs to fix these .la files by replacing all the "/usr/lib" to "${SDKTARGETSYSROOT}/usr/lib", etc. This new "=" causes the original regular expression not work.
b.t.w. Do we still need the code in meta-toolchain to fix broken .la files? According to my understanding, the new sysroot support in libtool 2.4 should solve this problem, right? Thanks!
Best Regards,
- Lianhao Lu
More information about the poky
mailing list