[poky] poky and poky-target aliases for the SDK
Zhang, Jessica
jessica.zhang at intel.com
Thu May 5 19:39:13 PDT 2011
Ilya,
As Lianhao mentioned we're not abandoning meta-toolchain, but since adt installer provide you the flexibility to setup your development sysroot at your customized location which we believe is a big gain in embedded application development. Again, since adt is using opkg, you're still able to manage the toolchain install location under /opt/poky, and sysroot location using opkg as you use to do with meta-toolchain, just the opkg and opkg-target need to be modified to reflect the new locations based on adt-installer.
Thanks,
Jessica
-----Original Message-----
From: Lu, Lianhao
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2011 6:34 PM
To: Ilya Yanok; Zhang, Jessica
Cc: poky at pokylinux.org
Subject: RE: [poky] opkg and opkg-target aliases for the SDK
Ilya Yanok wrote on 2011-05-06:
> Hi Jessica,
>
> On 04.05.2011 21:21, Zhang, Jessica wrote:
>> The removal was part of the changes made for adt-installer which is
>> a new
> feature for Yocto 1.0 release. The old opkg and opkg-target aliases
> in the environment script was for add packages to the locked location
> of toolchain(aka
> SDK) and target sysroot. With Yocto 1.0 and adt-installer, it's still
> using opkg to install toolchain under /opt/poky/ but the sysroot is
> now a customized location that can be anywhere, which is specified in the adt_intaller.conf file...
>
> I see. Still as we are meta-toolchain users we are going to miss them...
> Or is meta-toolchain going to be abandoned and we should move to
> adt-installer?
>
Hi Ilya,
The meta-toolchain is still there for backward compatibilities. Another reason that the opkg-target and opkg were removed from the environment file in meta-toolchain is that now the meta-toolchain can be created not only by ipk, but by rpm/deb also, and the opkg/opkg-target is miss-leading for the rpm/deb cases.
Best Regards,
Lianhao
More information about the poky
mailing list