[poky] morty support for e500 (p1020, p2020)

Panagiotis Tamtamis tamtamis at gmail.com
Tue Dec 6 00:41:40 PST 2016


Morty branch does not compile clean for ppc e500.
Problem is a missing break at bin utils.

Patch:
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.27.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.27.inc
index fc81721..f5bdc90 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.27.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.27.inc
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
      file://0015-binutils-mips-gas-pic-relax-linkonce.diff \

file://0015-Refine-.cfi_sections-check-to-only-consider-compact-.patch \

file://0016-Fix-seg-fault-in-ARM-linker-when-trying-to-parse-a-b.patch \
+
file://binutils-gdb.git-8941017bc0226b60ce306d5271df15820ce66a53.patch \
 "
 S  = "${WORKDIR}/git"

diff --git
a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-gdb.git-8941017bc0226b60ce306d5271df15820ce66a53.patch
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-gdb.git-8941017bc0226b60ce306d5271df15820ce66a53.patch
index e69de29..9759525 100644
---
a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-gdb.git-8941017bc0226b60ce306d5271df15820ce66a53.patch
+++
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/binutils-gdb.git-8941017bc0226b60ce306d5271df15820ce66a53.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail.com>
+Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:27:32 +0000 (+0930)
+Subject: ppc apuinfo for spe parsed incorrectly
+X-Git-Url:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=8941017bc0226b60ce306d5271df15820ce66a53
+
+ppc apuinfo for spe parsed incorrectly
+
+apuinfo saying SPE resulted in mach = bfd_mach_ppc_vle due to a
+missing break.
+
+       PR 20531
+       * elf32-ppc.c (_bfd_elf_ppc_set_arch): Add missing "break".
+---
+
+diff --git a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
+index 92299bc..1dd6d78 100644
+--- a/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
++++ b/bfd/elf32-ppc.c
+@@ -2246,6 +2246,7 @@ _bfd_elf_ppc_set_arch (bfd *abfd)
+               case PPC_APUINFO_BRLOCK:
+                 if (mach != bfd_mach_ppc_vle)
+                   mach = bfd_mach_ppc_e500;
++                break;
+
+               case PPC_APUINFO_VLE:
+                 mach = bfd_mach_ppc_vle;



But should I push this change since NXP removed its support and conf files
at meta-fsl-ppc for morty branch?


Best regards,
Tamis

-- 
Think simple!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/poky/attachments/20161206/871cdf1c/attachment.html>


More information about the poky mailing list