[poky] [PATCH] maintainers.inc: add missing recipes
Alexander Kanavin
alexander.kanavin at linux.intel.com
Wed Jun 15 05:18:16 PDT 2016
On 06/15/2016 01:10 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 12:51 +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>> Most of the additions are these:
>> 1) Missing variants for a recipe (-native, -cross, etc.)
>> 2) Recently added recipes; the maintainer is typically the person
>> who submitted the addition
>>
>> If you disagree with the assignments, speak up!
>
> I'm a little concerned with this patch. We should only be adding native
> or nativesdk recipes which are native or nativesdk only. We don't have
> very many of those. In the other cases, we should be able to infer the
> same maintainer from the target version. Could you have a quick look
> over these entries and see if we should be inferring some of them
> suggesting a problem in that inferring code, wherever it may be. I just
> worry we'd end up adding all -native and nativesdk- variants to this
> file which seems a bit pointless...
The additions are only for those -native recipes which are defined in
separate .bb files in addition to basic .bb recipes. I think it makes
sense that RRS doesn't try to map those to basic recipes, and treats
them separately.
If/when those separate native recipes are merged with basic recipes,
then separate maintainer lines can be dropped as well.
Alex
More information about the poky
mailing list