[Toaster] filtering tasks by order

[Barros Pena, Belen]

On 20/01/2014 00:53, "Ravi Chintakunta" <ravi.chintakunta at timesys.com>
wrote:

>Sorting tasks, both ascending and descending, by execution order is
>implemented. It is the filtering of tasks by execution order that is not
>implemented.
>
>-Ravi
>________________________________________
>From: Reyna, David [david.reyna at windriver.com]
>Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 6:45 PM
>To: Ravi Chintakunta; 'Barros Pena, Belen'; 'Damian, Alexandru'; Lerner,
>Dave; 'Zhang, Jessica'
>Cc: 'toaster at yoctoproject.org'
>Subject: RE: filtering tasks by order
>
>Hi,
>
>I am curious.
>
>If you re-sort the table by something other than "execution order", how
>would you be able to return to "execution order" if we disable sorting on
>this column?

I am not sure if I understand correctly, but just to clarify: we shouldn't
disable the sorting on the order column. Basically, column headings have 3
main states:

- Sortable (looks like a link)
- Not sortable (has the class muted applied so is pale grey and has no
hover state)
- Sorted (black, bold with a caret up or down next to it)

The all tasks table is by default sorted by Order, so when you land on
that page the Order heading is in the sorted state. If you then click on
any of the other sortable headings (for example, recipe) the Order heading
moves to the sortable state, and the recipe heading would change to the
sorted state. You can click back on the Order heading at any time to sort
the table by order again.

I hope this makes sense. Any questions, let me know.

Belén

>
>I agree that reverse sorting for "execution order" is not useful, and
>should not be supported, but re-asserting a forward sort I think would be
>a requirement.
>
>- David
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ravi Chintakunta [mailto:ravi.chintakunta at timesys.com]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 8:33 AM
>> To: 'Barros Pena, Belen'; 'Damian, Alexandru'; Reyna, David; Lerner,
>> Dave; 'Zhang, Jessica'
>> Cc: 'toaster at yoctoproject.org'
>> Subject: RE: filtering tasks by order
>>
>> Hi Belen,
>>
>> >  >
>> >  >
>> >  >>  Having said that, I am very much open to change. If people do
>> >  agree
>> >  >>  that
>> >  >>  filtering tasks by their execution order is not useful, let's
>> get
>> >  rid
>> >  >>  of
>> >  >>  that filter.
>> >  >>
>> >  >
>> >  >Yeah, let's wait for comments from others.
>> >  >
>> >  >
>>
>> I have not implemented filtering tasks by execution order in my latest
>> commit. The base code includes displaying filtering options only as
>> radio buttons.
>>
>> I have also not implemented "Show all tasks" button in the tooltip for
>> the active filter icon.
>>
>> Also, can you let me know the css for the active filter icon tooltip.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ravi
>>
>> Also, please let me know the style to use for the active
>