[Toaster] search behaviour
Damian, Alexandru
alexandru.damian at intel.com
Tue Jul 14 08:01:22 PDT 2015
Hi,
I updated the typeaheads for the project page, using this sort, and using
the minimum length for typeaheads at two characters.
The branch was pushed here:
adamian/20150708_sorting
http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=adamian/20150708_sorting
I am not sure if this is the right solution, pending feedback from Tiago,
but it gives you guys a chance to see how it feels.
Cheers,
Alex
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Barros Pena, Belen <
belen.barros.pena at intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 09/07/2015 10:52, "Damian, Alexandru" <alexandru.damian at intel.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >No, Monday is not late. We can implement it either way - just a note; in
> >tables, searching and sorting is disjunct, we do them independently. But
> >we can implement "sortbysearch" on a single field,
> > and this is what I'm doing.
> >
> >
> >For typeaheads, I have a prototype working doing this client-side. But if
> >this sort of behaviour is desired in the table pages, too, then it's
> >worth implementing it server-side as a special type
> > of search.
> >
> >
> >One more question - is it ok if I trigger the typeahead when the user
> >input reaches 2 characters in length ? Right now it starts on the first
> >character, but I think the results of searching on
> > one character are too wide - it matches everything !
>
> Yes, I think that should work fine. Let me know if you see anything weird
> in the behaviour when you try it, but I wouldn't think so.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Belén
>
> >
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Alex
> >
> >
> >On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
> ><belen.barros.pena at intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >On 09/07/2015 09:46, "Damian, Alexandru" <alexandru.damian at intel.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >>I've started working on:
> >>
> >>
> >>https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7152
> >
> >Ah, great: thanks for taking this on, Alex.
> >
> >>
> >>I wonder if the behaviour described is to happen only in the typeaheads,
> >>or if it would also apply to the search in tables.
> >>
> >>
> >>Case at hand - in Project compatible layers, when you search "open", do
> >>you expect to see "openembedded-core" at the top of the list, before the
> >>layer names starting with "meta" ? Currently, it is at
> >> the bottom of the search results, because "o" is after "m" in
> >>lexicographic order.
> >
> >Refining the search behaviour would make me really happy, but I am not
> >sure we can simply transpose the logic from the typeaheads to the tables.
> >The reason is that search matching in the typeaheads should be done only
> >against the 'name' (layer name, recipe name or machine name) and the layer
> >name (so that I can search for a layer name and get a list of for example
> >machines provided by that layer. This seems to be working at the moment by
> >the way, and I think it's quite nice).
> >
> >But in the tables we match against other fields too, most significantly
> >the description, which is useful because it allows users to type "natural
> >language" queries like "small image" and get results. If a search
> >query
> >matches against something in a description, I am not sure what the correct
> >sorting would be. There is a also a potential conflict in the tables
> >between the sorting applied and any custom sorting we use for search
> >results.
> >
> >So the answer is that it's worth putting some time into thinking this
> >through. I am going to ask Tiago if he could look at it and come up with a
> >design proposal by Monday EOD. Would that work? Or is it too late? It's a
> >holiday in Brazil today, so I know he can only start looking at this
> >tomorrow.
> >
> >Cheers
> >
> >Belén
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>Alex
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Alex Damian
> >>Yocto Project
> >>
> >>SSG / OTC
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Alex Damian
> >Yocto Project
> >
> >SSG / OTC
> >
> >
> >
>
>
--
Alex Damian
Yocto Project
SSG / OTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/toaster/attachments/20150714/a46e1353/attachment.html>
More information about the toaster
mailing list