[Toaster] [review-request] adamian/20150707_bugs

Damian, Alexandru alexandru.damian at intel.com
Fri Jul 24 08:11:04 PDT 2015


The new patchset lives at:

https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=adamian/bug_fixes

It is based on Bitbake, not on Poky.

Cheers,
Alex

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
alexandru.damian at intel.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I have rebased the patchset on top of bitbake, for easy merging, and added
> a number of patches:
>
> - fixing pylint issues in the toaster data logger
> - refactoring checksettings.py and fixing toasterconf.json file discovery
> - fixing display of all-builds page (do not show in-progress builds)
>
> Can you please review and submit for merging upstream ?
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
> alexandru.damian at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Revised patchset pushed to the same branch. This patchset passes the
>> HTML5 conformance tests, and fixes 500 page issues seen on the previous
>> version.
>>
>> Can you please review and submit upstream when possible ?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alex
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
>> alexandru.damian at intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Please hold on submitting this branch, spotted bug in the submission
>>> queue.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Damian, Alexandru <
>>> alexandru.damian at intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Michael Wood <michael.g.wood at intel.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 21/07/15 12:26, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am reluctant to use a check_output() call because I would like the
>>>>>> stderroroutput in the exception message as to debug easily what went wrong.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure I follow, the CalledProcessError exception generated by a
>>>>> non-zero exist status on check_output has all the data you'd need in it.
>>>>>
>>>>> ​The CalledProcessError has the return code, but not the stderr
>>>> output. Manually raising the exception allows me to get the stderr.​
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  The check_output() documentation specifies to use Popen with
>>>>>> communicate() in order to properly get the stderr output/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do not use stderr=PIPE with this function as that can deadlock based
>>>>>> on the child process error volume. UsePopen <
>>>>>> https://docs.python.org/2/library/subprocess.html#subprocess.Popen>
>>>>>> with the communicate() method when you need a stderr pipe.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If everything else is fine, can you please submit this patchset
>>>>>> upstream ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Michael Wood <
>>>>>> michael.g.wood at intel.com <mailto:michael.g.wood at intel.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     From 4c34c2261685ca45a0013ed331a9663bd5e15898 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
>>>>>> 2001
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     diff --git
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a/bitbake/lib/toaster/bldcontrol/management/commands/checksettings.py
>>>>>>
>>>>>> b/bitbake/lib/toaster/bldcontrol/management/commands/checksettings.py
>>>>>>     index 9b591ad..590a7b0 100644
>>>>>>     ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>> a/bitbake/lib/toaster/bldcontrol/management/commands/checksettings.py
>>>>>>     +++
>>>>>>
>>>>>> b/bitbake/lib/toaster/bldcontrol/management/commands/checksettings.py
>>>>>>     @@ -166,7 +166,12 @@ class Command(NoArgsCommand):
>>>>>>                          for dirname in
>>>>>>     self._recursive_list_directories(be.sourcedir,2):
>>>>>>                              if os.path.exists(os.path.join(dirname,
>>>>>>     ".templateconf")):
>>>>>>                                  import subprocess
>>>>>>     -                            conffilepath, error =
>>>>>>     subprocess.Popen('bash -c ". '+os.path.join(dirname,
>>>>>>     ".templateconf")+'; echo \"\$TEMPLATECONF\""', shell=True,
>>>>>>     stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()
>>>>>>     +                            proc = subprocess.Popen('bash -c ".
>>>>>>     '+os.path.join(dirname, ".templateconf")+'; echo
>>>>>>     \"\$TEMPLATECONF\""', shell=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE)
>>>>>>     +                            conffilepath, stderroroutput =
>>>>>>     proc.communicate()
>>>>>>     +                            proc.wait()
>>>>>>     +                            if proc.returncode != 0:
>>>>>>     +                                raise Exception("Failed to source
>>>>>>     TEMPLATECONF: %s" % stderroroutput)
>>>>>>     +
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Can't we just use subprocess.check_output and a try/except for all
>>>>>>     of this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Apart from that everything else looks fine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     On 15/07/15 13:31, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         The patch that Michael suggested to fix is now refactored, and
>>>>>>         the patchset rebased.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         I pushed the changes on the same branch (force update).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Can you please review ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         Cheers,
>>>>>>         Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Michael Wood
>>>>>>         <michael.g.wood at intel.com <mailto:michael.g.wood at intel.com>
>>>>>>         <mailto:michael.g.wood at intel.com
>>>>>>         <mailto:michael.g.wood at intel.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Could you include the summary of each of the commits for
>>>>>>         review so
>>>>>>             that we can be sure which patches are the new ones
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             * 3b0073f bitbake: toaster: fix updates on failed build
>>>>>>         requests
>>>>>>             * 1bdd687 bitbake: toaster: replace raising Exceptions in
>>>>>>         loadconf
>>>>>>             * 99a626a bitbake: toaster: do not stop data import on bad
>>>>>>         data
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Look fine to me
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             * 4fc46e7 bitbake: toastergui: fixing pylint warnings
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             This one needs splitting up, pylint fixes, logging fixes ,
>>>>>>         string
>>>>>>             to int casting, etc
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             Michael
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             On 08/07/15 15:52, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 On 07/07/2015 17:27, "Damian, Alexandru"
>>>>>>                 <alexandru.damian at intel.com
>>>>>>         <mailto:alexandru.damian at intel.com>
>>>>>>         <mailto:alexandru.damian at intel.com
>>>>>>         <mailto:alexandru.damian at intel.com>>>
>>>>>>                 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     I have some comments below,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Alex
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Barros Pena, Belen
>>>>>>                     <belen.barros.pena at intel.com
>>>>>>         <mailto:belen.barros.pena at intel.com>
>>>>>>                     <mailto:belen.barros.pena at intel.com
>>>>>>         <mailto:belen.barros.pena at intel.com>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     On 07/07/2015 15:10, "Damian, Alexandru"
>>>>>>                     <alexandru.damian at intel.com
>>>>>>         <mailto:alexandru.damian at intel.com>
>>>>>>                     <mailto:alexandru.damian at intel.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         <mailto:alexandru.damian at intel.com>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         I'm pushing two patches for review
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         - one is fixing 7955
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Thanks for the quick fix, Alex! I've tested this
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>                     master, and I've
>>>>>>                     noticed a couple of things:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     1. The invalid data from the layer index causes
>>>>>>         warnings
>>>>>>                     when importing
>>>>>>                     the information. This might be because the debug
>>>>>>         mode is
>>>>>>                     enabled, though,
>>>>>>                     but I thought I'd bringing it up just in case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     ​This happens because data doesn't match what
>>>>>> Toaster
>>>>>>                     expect - Toaster
>>>>>>                     has a bit stricter ​requirements than Layer Index.
>>>>>>         I would
>>>>>>                     expect that
>>>>>>                     the warning messages are helpful to the user, and
>>>>>> they
>>>>>>                     should not be
>>>>>>                     obscured. If a particular user wishes to not see
>>>>>>         some of
>>>>>>                     the messages,
>>>>>>                     they can set up the debug level to something
>>>>>> higher in
>>>>>>                     settings.py. Or we
>>>>>>                     can ship with a higher debug level by default, but
>>>>>>         I don't
>>>>>>                     think we
>>>>>>                     should silently ignore bad data.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Sure: I can see your point. I was only bringing it up,
>>>>>>         but I
>>>>>>                 am not sure
>>>>>>                 what's best, to be honest: showing them or not. As you
>>>>>>         said,
>>>>>>                 falling
>>>>>>                 silent doesn't sound right; on the other hand, the
>>>>>>         messages
>>>>>>                 look a bit
>>>>>>                 alarming.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     2. I can see at least one recipe in the 'all
>>>>>> recipes'
>>>>>>                     table without a
>>>>>>                     name. This particular one is provided by meta-ivi.
>>>>>>         You can
>>>>>>                     add the layer
>>>>>>                     and you get a build button, which you can click,
>>>>>>         although
>>>>>>                     when you do so
>>>>>>                     the build does not seem to start. I think we need
>>>>>>         to hide
>>>>>>                     any recipes that
>>>>>>                     do not have a name from the list. They are
>>>>>>         invalid, and
>>>>>>                     should not be
>>>>>>                     exposed to  users.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     ​We can add such a check, of course, on imported
>>>>>>         data. I
>>>>>>                     would say this
>>>>>>                     is the object of a different bug report, though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Done!
>>>>>>         https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7969
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Also, I think we are going to need to back port
>>>>>>         the fix to
>>>>>>                     Fido.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Is back porting ok? Should we track this somehow?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                 Belén
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     Belén
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         - one is fixing various issues highlighted by
>>>>>>         pylint
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=adamian/20
>>>>>>                         1
>>>>>>                         50707_bugs
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         ​Can you please review ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         Cheers,
>>>>>>                         Alex​
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         --
>>>>>>                         Alex Damian
>>>>>>                         Yocto Project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                         SSG / OTC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     --             Alex Damian
>>>>>>                     Yocto Project
>>>>>>
>>>>>>                     SSG / OTC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             --  _______________________________________________
>>>>>>             toaster mailing list
>>>>>>         toaster at yoctoproject.org <mailto:toaster at yoctoproject.org>
>>>>>>         <mailto:toaster at yoctoproject.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         <mailto:toaster at yoctoproject.org>>
>>>>>>         https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/toaster
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         --         Alex Damian
>>>>>>         Yocto Project
>>>>>>         SSG / OTC
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>         Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
>>>>>>         Registered No. 1134945 (England)
>>>>>>         Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
>>>>>>         VAT No: 860 2173 47
>>>>>>
>>>>>>         This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
>>>>>>         material for
>>>>>>         the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
>>>>>>         distribution
>>>>>>         by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>>>>>         recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>     Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
>>>>>>     Registered No. 1134945 (England)
>>>>>>     Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
>>>>>>     VAT No: 860 2173 47
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>     the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
>>>>>> distribution
>>>>>>     by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>>>>>     recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Alex Damian
>>>>>> Yocto Project
>>>>>> SSG / OTC
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
>>>>>> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
>>>>>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
>>>>>> VAT No: 860 2173 47
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>>>>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>>>>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>>>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
>>>>> Registered No. 1134945 (England)
>>>>> Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
>>>>> VAT No: 860 2173 47
>>>>>
>>>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
>>>>> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
>>>>> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
>>>>> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alex Damian
>>>> Yocto Project
>>>> SSG / OTC
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Alex Damian
>>> Yocto Project
>>> SSG / OTC
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Alex Damian
>> Yocto Project
>> SSG / OTC
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alex Damian
> Yocto Project
> SSG / OTC
>



-- 
Alex Damian
Yocto Project
SSG / OTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/toaster/attachments/20150724/8fc3c2d7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the toaster mailing list