[Toaster] toaster automated testing

[Damian, Alexandru]

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Richard Purdie <
richard.purdie at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 15:21 +0100, Damian, Alexandru wrote:
> > My thinking is that unit tests, that are to be run inside the django
> > application, should be in bitbake.
> >
> > These tests are integration and smoke tests, with a long list of
> > dependencies (selenium, browsers, w3c-validator, various other tools)
> > and I wouldn't want to bring these dependencies into Bitbake.
> > Furthermore, the code structure is not integrated at all with current
> > code in Toaster, Bitbake, or oe-selftest framework. It doesn't fit in.
> >
> > Unit tests that validate individual Toaster features and bug fixes are
> > to be implemented in Django unit test framework, and live inside
> > Bitbake.
>
>
> I agree they don't belong alongside the existing tests, we could put
> them in a contrib style directory though (I'm open to suggestions) and
> document that there are certain dependencies needed to use them?
>
>
​Yep, this is do-able - they will have no relationship at code level with
existing infrastructure though; separate requirements.txt and README will
be provided to guide usage. Is this ok?



> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>


-- 
Alex Damian
Yocto Project
SSG / OTC
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/toaster/attachments/20150508/9c9d1a69/attachment.html>