[yocto] Bugzilla Reorg Take 2

[Bruce Ashfield]

On 10-11-17 8:29 PM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 03:32 PM, Saul Wold wrote:
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> After reviewing the emails from the first attempt and review bugzilla,
>> there are a couple of different approaches that can be taken. It's
>> important to note that bugzilla supports 3 layers, Classification,
>> Product and Components, version are tracked at the Product level.
>>
>> Since we have 3 Layers, there are 2 possible scenarios:
>>
>> This is the Yocto Projects Bugzilla, so each "project" can have it's
>> own classification, I am not sure that this is the best since some of
>> the projects are pretty flat the extra level does not make sense.
>>
>> I am proposing the following top level classifications, containing the
>> following projects (products/components) :
>>
>> Yocto Projects
> ...
>> - Kernel
>>    - build
>>    - configuration
>>    - runtime
>
> Acked-by: Darren Hart<dvhart at linux.intel.com>
>
>> - BSPs
>>    - by board??
>
> Let's start off simple - by board might not scale well. Just "BSP" would
> be my vote - Bruce might have additional thoughts.

This is the sane thing to do. One category 'bsp'. We can specify
the BSP in the subject of the bug. If a bug appears across a
class of BSPs or an arch, it gets bumped to kernel runtime and
is dealt with there.

We've been using this scheme for about 200 supported BSPs, so it
should do just fine here as well.

Cheers,

Bruce

>