[yocto] [meta-fsl-ppc][PATCH 2/2] fsl.conf: Let linux-qoriq-sdk-headers-nativesdk provide linux-libc-headers-nativesdk

[Khem Raj]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:23 AM, David Nyström <david.nystrom at enea.com> wrote:
> On 08/14/2012 09:26 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:49 AM, David Nyström <david.nystrom at enea.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, it looks like this was merged to the denzil branch, and
>>> PREFERRED_PROVIDER_linux-libc-headers-nativesdk was moved back to
>>> distro.conf.
>>> Any reason for this ?
>>
>> why do you want nativesdk headers to come from BSP its a fsl-ppc bsp I
>> dont expect it to have something special for SDK hosts which are
>> usually x86 ? afterall these are for
>> the SDK host and not for target. Moreover it means that this BSP will
>> not play in the multi BSP environment something you never want.
>
>
> My main concern is that meta-toolchain uses linux-libc-headers-nativesdk for
> the meta-toolchain
> tarball build, i.e. the meta-toolchain API may differ from the on-target API
> in regards to kernel-headers, no ?
>
> This might very well be true if kernel version of
> linux-libc-headers-nativesdk != linux-libc-headers

whats the point of keeping header versions same across two entirely
different systems.
can you point to some instances where this API difference if any is in
conflict ?