[yocto] ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary

[Saxena, Rahul]

Yes, rearranging the package generation order worked. Was not aware that default package
generation could change between poky releases.

Rahul

-----Original Message-----
From: Saxena, Rahul 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:54 PM
To: Saxena, Rahul; Chris Larson
Cc: Khem Raj; yocto at yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary

Looks like the order of packages (as shown in bitbake.conf) in PACKAGES variable is different  in 1.3_M3 compared to Denzel.

In 1.3_M3, ${PN} package is last (that is comes after ${PN}-dev package) ..so that probably explains the issue.
I will explicitly change it and try-out.

Chris, you were right bitbake.conf was the place to look at :)

Rahul


-----Original Message-----
From: Saxena, Rahul
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:25 PM
To: 'Chris Larson'
Cc: Khem Raj; yocto at yoctoproject.org
Subject: RE: [yocto] ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary

oe-core/meta/conf/bitbake.conf specifies the default package settings.
However the problem I seem to be seeing is that my recipe is not able to override the default.

However let me know if I should still be looking at that file..

Rahul

-----Original Message-----
From: kergoth at gmail.com [mailto:kergoth at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Larson
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 12:07 PM
To: Saxena, Rahul
Cc: Khem Raj; yocto at yoctoproject.org
Subject: Re: [yocto] ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary

On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Saxena, Rahul <rahul.saxena at intel.com> wrote:
> You are right, these are regular files and not symlinks and are ending 
> up in usr/lib in packagename-dev package However I want them to be in the regular package.
>
> I do have the following statement in my recipe:
>
> FILES_${PN} += "${libdir}/lib*.so"
>
> and nothing in my recipe has statements such as FILES_${PN)-dev = ...


Read oe-core/meta/conf/bitbake.conf.

--
Christopher Larson