[yocto] build error after recent pull
jfabernathy
jfabernathy at gmail.com
Mon Mar 19 13:49:38 PDT 2012
On 03/19/2012 04:25 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> On 2012-03-19 13:25, jfabernathy wrote:
>> On 03/19/2012 03:13 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> On 2012-03-19 13:04, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>> On 03/19/2012 03:03 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 2012-03-19 12:59, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/19/2012 02:55 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2012-03-19 10:02, jfabernathy wrote:
>>>>>>>> Just did a git pull today on poky and meta-intel. I tried to
>>>>>>>> rebuild meta-sugarbay again and got a build error. Not sure why
>>>>>>>> yet. Not critical, just a spot check of things.
>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NOTE: package mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1: task do_configure: Succeeded
>>>>>>>> NOTE: Running task 1723 of 5148 (ID: 1928,
>>>>>>>> /home/jim/poky/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri_7.11.bb,
>>>>>>>> do_compile)
>>>>>>>> NOTE: package mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1: task do_compile: Started
>>>>>>>> ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see
>>>>>>>> /build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/temp/log.do_compile.25687
>>>>>>>> for further information)
>>>>>>>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>>>>>>>> /build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/temp/log.do_compile.25687
>>>>>>>> Log data follows:
>>>>>>>> | DEBUG: SITE files ['endian-little', 'common-linux',
>>>>>>>> 'common-glibc', 'bit-64', 'x86_64-linux', 'common']
>>>>>>>> | ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see
>>>>>>>> /build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/temp/log.do_compile.25687
>>>>>>>> for further information)
>>>>>>>> | NOTE: make -j 8
>>>>>>>> | make[1]: Entering directory
>>>>>>>> `/build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/Mesa-7.11/src'
>>>>>>>> | Making sources for autoconf
>>>>>>>> | make[2]: Entering directory
>>>>>>>> `/build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/Mesa-7.11/src/mapi/glapi'
>>>>>>>> | make[2]: *** No rule to make target
>>>>>>>> `/build/sugarbay-master/tmp/sysroots/x86_64-linux/usr/lib/x86_64-poky-linux/gcc/x86_64-poky-linux/4.6.3/include/stddef.h',
>>>>>>>> needed by
>>>>>>>> `glapi_dispatch.o'. Stop.
>>>>>>>> | make[2]: Leaving directory
>>>>>>>> `/build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/Mesa-7.11/src/mapi/glapi'
>>>>>>>> | make[1]: *** [subdirs] Error 1
>>>>>>>> | make[1]: Leaving directory
>>>>>>>> `/build/sugarbay-master/tmp/work/x86_64-poky-linux/mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1/Mesa-7.11/src'
>>>>>>>> | make: *** [default] Error 1
>>>>>>>> | ERROR: oe_runmake failed
>>>>>>>> NOTE: package mesa-dri-2_7.11-r13.1: task do_compile: Failed
>>>>>>>> ERROR: Task 1928
>>>>>>>> (/home/jim/poky/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri_7.11.bb,
>>>>>>>> do_compile) failed with exit code '1'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What's your build host?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Was this build from scratch? There was a discussion of much the
>>>>>>> same error on the meta-ti list last week where the host GCC was
>>>>>>> updated between two subsequent builds that gave this error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Building on latest release Ubuntu 11.10 (Linux ubuntu-x64
>>>>>> 3.0.0-16-generic #29-Ubuntu SMP)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> gcc is 4.6.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Was your build from scratch? Do you use [extant] sstate cache?
>>>>>
>>>> I had a preview successful build and just reran that after bitbake
>>>> -c cleanall core-image-sato
>>>
>>> Do you have rm_work in your local.conf?
>>
>> No to question on rm_work in local.conf
>>>
>>> Try this:
>>> % bitbake -c cleansstate mesa-dri
>>> % bitbake mesa-dri
>>
>> This work without errors. I'm now doing bitbake core-image-sato to
>> see if it completes.
>>
>>>
>>> BTW, 'bitbake -c cleanall core-image-sato' doesn't really do much -
>>> images don't have much (any?)
>>> stuff that needs to get cleaned. You can run 'bitbake
>>> core-image-sato' as many times as you like
>>> and it will completely rebuild the image every time.
>>>
>>>
>> So if I do a git pull and want to retest with new stuff, just bitbake
>> core-image-sato or should I do something with cleansstate??
>
> If you run just 'bitbake core-image-sato', any packages (recipes)
> which have been changed that are used by the image will be rebuilt.
> You should not have to clean anything for this to work properly.
>
After I fixed mesa-dri and started bitbake core-image-sato, it ran for a
long time and had a build failure similar to the first one on
kexec-tools. I did the bitbake -c cleansstate kexec-tools trick again
and restarted bitbake core-image-sato. Not sure why this is, but it
seems to work.
Jim a
More information about the yocto
mailing list