[yocto] Host contamination that isn't
Gary Thomas
gary at mlbassoc.com
Tue Mar 8 23:50:52 PST 2016
On 2016-03-08 14:33, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I'm getting a lot of messages like this:
> amanda: /amanda/usr/sbin/amtoc is owned by uid 1000, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may be due
> to host contamination
> amanda: /amanda/usr/sbin/amcrypt-ossl is owned by uid 1000, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may
> be due to host contamination
> amanda: /amanda/usr/sbin/amvault is owned by uid 1000, which is the same as the user running bitbake. This may be due
> to host contamination
>
> In reality, this is not really a problem. I'm building a recipe
> which adds a user to my system image that just happens to have the
> same UID as mine (first user added, go figure). So the messages in
> this case are quite bogus.
>
> How can I avoid them? When I add my extra user to my image, is
> there a way to force the UID/GID to something I know is "safe"?
I solved this by adding '--system' to my USERADD setup.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the yocto
mailing list