[yocto] Bitbake failure:

[pawanKumar]

Thanks, I'll look into it.
For yocto-2.5 M3 rc1 they have given as
bitbake -c fetchall core-image-sato
That means it is a failure.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 7:52 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 09:19 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
>
> Thanks for your tip.
> Can I use capital c in place of small c.
>
>
> Not quite sure what you mean. If you are trying to do:
>
> bitbake -C fetchall core-image-sato
>
> that doesn't work anymore AFAIK. I don't think there is currently a way to
> do a "force invalidate" (e.g. -f) with --runall, although TBH I'm not sure
> if 'bitbake -C fetchall' did that anyway. Perhaps someone more familiar
> with the recursive dependencies can chime in.
>
> However, I recently ran into a case where having -f apply to --runall was
> useful, so I have a patch in my contrib tree to add support for it. If
> that's what you're trying to do, I'm curious what the use case is? I
> haven't pushed the patch to the mailing list because I'm not sure if my use
> is actually valid.
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 9:20 PM Joshua Watt <jpewhacker at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-03-23 at 07:31 +0000, pawanKumar wrote:
>
> Hi team,
> When I tried to run (bitbate -c fetchall) it is giving error as
> "target do_fetchall is not found for image core-image-sato".
> How to over come this error.
>
>
> I believe fetchall was superseded by --runall. Try:
>
> bitbake --runall fetch core-image-sato
>
>
> Regards
> Pavan.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.yoctoproject.org/pipermail/yocto/attachments/20180328/575d2c21/attachment.html>