[meta-ti] Is it intended to build TI bootloaders with march=armv5?

[Andreas Müller]

Hi

as some of you might know, I am desperately working on u-boot SPL support for 
gumstix overo and having very strange effects: as soon as a stacic integer 
variable is accessed, the bootloader hangs [1].

In the compile logs I found ( checked also for beagleboard ) that 

march=armv5

is used ( x-load is build with march=armv7-a ). Is this intended? Could this 
explain my trouble?

Andreas

[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-December/113491.html