[meta-ti] Is it intended to build TI bootloaders with march=armv5?

[Kridner, Jason]

Do you have the disassembly around the access?
________________________________________
From: meta-ti-bounces at yoctoproject.org [meta-ti-bounces at yoctoproject.org] on behalf of Andreas Müller [schnitzeltony at gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2011 4:21 AM
To: meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
Subject: [meta-ti] Is it intended to build TI bootloaders with march=armv5?

Hi

as some of you might know, I am desperately working on u-boot SPL support for
gumstix overo and having very strange effects: as soon as a stacic integer
variable is accessed, the bootloader hangs [1].

In the compile logs I found ( checked also for beagleboard ) that

march=armv5

is used ( x-load is build with march=armv7-a ). Is this intended? Could this
explain my trouble?

Andreas

[1] http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-December/113491.html


_______________________________________________
meta-ti mailing list
meta-ti at yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti